Re: LVT: more arguments against

In sci.econ, royls@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> ??? You are a liar. I have answered your questions clearly, where
> that is possible. Some of them are nothing but trivial and obvious
> dishonesties and obfuscations I have demolished dozens of times
> before.

You have answered many easy questions, but unfortunately, you have ignored
many difficult ones.



> Yet you still pretend

I am not pretending, Kreskin, and you know less than you seem to think you
do.



> >Likewise, if I ask enough questions about implictions, I can
> >get closer to a determination of whether a concept holds togeter or falls
> >apart.

> You have shown no interest whatever in knowing the implications. You
> refuse to know even the facts that _have_ those implications.

ISTM that I asked several times for facts and was answered with conclusory
doctinaire piffle. At the point I gave up on one line of questioning,
your answer was that the facts were self-evident.

Someone else, more sophisticated in their knowlege than you, ventured that
yur position was not a matter of fact, but that it all came down to a
value judgement.

> It has never yet gained the latter, and never can. So far, you have
> steadfastly refused to understand the concepts the theory is basd on.

So far, I've asked questions about the conceptual underpinnings upon
which the theory relies. This has made you uncomfortable, given your
superficial understanding of them.



> >The jury is still out, in my mind. But I've got to admit, sine I
> >like learning new concepts more than just about anything else, I am
> >enjoying this process. My motives are not to intentionally misunderstand.
> >Quite to opposite, in fact.

> Then it's your intention to make _others_ misunderstand?

If you were a funny guy, I'd congratulate you on making a good joke.
Sadly, however, you've been humorless throughout, and I can only assume
you are unintentionally disingenuous.

--
Words are flying out like endless rain into a paper cup.
They slither while they pass. They slip away across the universe.

--John Lennon
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Historical comparisons
    ... According to the founder of the US Libertarian Party, ... I have refuted all your arguments by simply identifying facts of ... dislike those implications does not affect the fact that they are ... ability to own private property in no way creates privileged castes. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: .NET
    ... I saw innuendo and implications, but no facts. ... John Kaster http://blogs.borland.com/johnk ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Rewrite for clarification Re: Civil marriage for non-Jews in Israel
    ... ISTM that Cindy sees some implication in these facts that some of the ... And ISTM that you habitually like to beat dead horses. ... Well, *I* see those implications. ... Do something today about the Darfur Genocide ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)