Re: US Supreme Court approves eminent domain


"Les Cargill" <lNOcargill@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote

> There's nothing contradictory about it. Theft is just theft,
> and if it wears the beard of legality, it's legalized.


As a blanket statement, that's just wrong. The only difference between a
"theft" and a "purchase" is the _price_. If I offer you a thousand bucks
for your car, you refuse the offer, and I impose the deal on you anyway, you
can claim to be a victim of "theft". Now, substitute "million" for
"thousand". Still feel robbed?

-- TP


.