Re: LVT dustup over at AngryBear
- From: "ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx" <ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Jul 2005 16:26:05 -0700
>That means the broad middle class should be taxed at the lowest
>possible rate.
Agreed.
>The downside to high tax rates on upper incomes is
>that it spawns an army of lawyers and accountants working
>(unproductively) to create tax shelters and to work Congress for
>special deals in the tax code.
Also agree.
>The maximum rate should never again be set as high as it once was,
>but I think the tax burden should be shifted towards the upper income
>end.
I think that the tax burden should be shifted off of productive
activity and onto unproductive rentier activity.
.
- References:
- Re: LVT dustup over at AngryBear
- From: ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: LVT dustup over at AngryBear
- From: Folsom Inmate
- Re: LVT dustup over at AngryBear
- From: William F Hummel
- Re: LVT dustup over at AngryBear
- Prev by Date: Re: LVT dustup over at AngryBear
- Next by Date: Re: Landlordism and Slavery. was: Live8
- Previous by thread: Re: LVT dustup over at AngryBear
- Next by thread: Re: LVT dustup over at AngryBear
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|