Re: Smith: ground rents and land rents
- From: Les Cargill <lNOcargill@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:05:26 GMT
royls@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 03:45:46 GMT, Les Cargill <lNOcargill@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
royls@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 18 Aug 2005 17:13:53 -0700, "ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx" <ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When Adam Smith wrote, "Both ground-rents and the ordinary rent of land are a species of revenue which the owner, in many cases, enjoys without any care or attention of his own." what precisely did he mean by "ground-rents" and "ordinary rent of land."?
"Ground rent" means the land rent. The "ordinary rent of land" means rent in the vernacular sense which includes improvements.
IMO the ordinary rent of land would be rent received from tenants in return for use of the land net of improvements, while ground rent is the economic rent of the land, which can also be captured by the owner directly -- e.g., a plantation owner can collect the ground rent by employing an overseer to run his plantation rather than letting the land to tenants.
I am skeptical of just how helpful this is in enabling those who do not understand rent, to understand rent.
I was just trying to clarify what (I suppose) Smith meant.
Certainly! Rent is more from Ricardo's work, though. It's not an easy concept. I don't think *I* have it, quite yet :)
If I may, rent is simply gain from sources other than those which can be commonly agreed on as "earned".
IMO that is highly misleading. Lottery winnings are not rent. Inheritance is not rent. Robbery is not rent.
Right.
There is a big difference between the income of a bandit who robs people passing through a forest and the income of a holder of a royal license to collect tolls from the very same travelers: if you assert your rights against the depredations of the former and overcome him by force, the government will give you a pat on the back, whereas if you do likewise against the latter, it will hunt you down and forcibly deprive you of your liberty, assets and/or life. Likewise for the contrasting cases of unauthorized foreign land appropriators (i.e., invaders) and officially approved domestic ones.
But this distinction may be described by 'some rob with a gun, some with a fountain pen'.
But this is also problematic, as it requires a rigorous definition of "earned". We might define "earned" in terms of "rent".
But that would be circular.
Why not define "earned" as "obtained in return for commensurate contribution"?
But commensurate how? Land rent would appear to be a measure of value in that it's traded.
There's the Ricardian version, in which location is an independent variable to a (not necessarily continuous ) productivity function.
Land rent is the economic value of this difference. And even though Ricardo stated this in terms of agriculture, it generalizes.
-- Roy L
-- Les Cargill .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Smith: ground rents and land rents
- From: royls
- Re: Smith: ground rents and land rents
- References:
- Smith: ground rents and land rents
- From: sinister
- Re: Smith: ground rents and land rents
- From: ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Smith: ground rents and land rents
- From: royls
- Re: Smith: ground rents and land rents
- From: Les Cargill
- Re: Smith: ground rents and land rents
- From: royls
- Smith: ground rents and land rents
- Prev by Date: Who is number-challenged: Krugman or Kudlow?
- Next by Date: Re: Smith: ground rents and land rents
- Previous by thread: Re: Smith: ground rents and land rents
- Next by thread: Re: Smith: ground rents and land rents
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading