Why study general equilibrium models of perfect competition?
- From: "ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx" <ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Aug 2005 15:50:53 -0700
Given that the core of modern microeconomics consists primarily of GE
models of perfect competition, and that these models do not even
vaguely resemble any markets that exist in reality, what is the
objective for studying them? The typical answer is that they represent
some sort of flawless (if unobtainable) ideal and that by studying the
attributes of the model and the effect of real world deviations from
this ideal, we can understand what effect further deviations will have.
Is this a valid approach though? Or would it be more useful to focus
from the start on models that more accurately reflect reality (e.g.,
dynamic vs static equilibrium models and models of monopolistic
competition and oligopoly vs models of perfect competition)? Are GE PC
models really the starting point against which to judge all other
models or are they just another model no more relevant than any other?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why study general equilibrium models of perfect competition?
- From: royls
- Re: Why study general equilibrium models of perfect competition?
- From: Les Cargill
- Re: Why study general equilibrium models of perfect competition?
- From: conover
- Re: Why study general equilibrium models of perfect competition?
- From: William F Hummel
- Re: Why study general equilibrium models of perfect competition?
- Prev by Date: Re: Questions on the Economist's article: "The not-so-incredible shrinking deficit"
- Next by Date: Re: Why study general equilibrium models of perfect competition?
- Previous by thread: Official Debt and Public Debt
- Next by thread: Re: Why study general equilibrium models of perfect competition?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|