Re: An admonition



The Trucker wrote:

"Les Cargill" <lNOcargill@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:nAQPe.64064$Yx1.50168@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Mason A. Clark wrote:


We sometimes lapse our logic.

The phenomenons of "global warming" , "globalization of economies" ,
"outsourcing" , etcetera are *not* the decisions of corporations.

They are the decisions of governments -- politicians -- (under the influence of corporations perhaps). But in the most important nations -- democracies -- the politicians are *chosen* by the people. George W. Bush being an outstanding example, Bill Clinton another.

Don't blame the corporations for what the *people* decide.

Mason C the solution is?

Good luck selling that line of thought. I'd agree, by the way.


In this country there are two parties that dominate (or
there is,at least, the appearance of two parties).  Viable
candidates are selected based on how much money they
can raise for The Party. So these people who "decide"
will be deciding between which of the two bought and
paid for politicians they can stomach.  These are the
only sows in the pen because that is what the TwoParty
does by design and intent.


Right. And the alternative is a system of coalition governments, such as in Italy.

The United States was not actually designed to work
that way.


But this way actually works. Isn't the old saw
"laws and sausages..."?

Neither the people who drafted or the>> folks that
> ratified the Constitution wanted or intended
this sorry result.

By the time Jefferson was elected, there were two parties. England had two or more parties, essentially two.

> And it happened due to various
cracks in the masonry.  The 16th and 17th amendments
destroyed states rights and the decision by the House
to limit membership to 435 sealed the control of
the TwoParty.

It also kept the House manageable. The level of population growth was not something anyone could have anticipated.

Also, FWIW, the House assures the rural states are *over*
represented, which puts things on more a plebescite
footing than would party organs from urban centers
running things. It creates Centers of Pork
Excellence, but there's certainly representation.


The common people are not represented
and they have no chance of ever being represented
until the limit to House Membership is changed to
reflect the intent of the Constitution.


Poll data consistently show the common people *are* represented, and the person arguably most adept at interpeting opinion poll data in favor of getting his candidate elected is none other than Karl Rove.

Carville showed smiliar talent, so the Dems ... don't
use him anymore. *Sigh*.

I'm sorry; it is not true that present elected officials
are not representative. That's a much easier way to
look at it, but it simply isn't true.

--
Les Cargill
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: dont even try to undergo a cat
    ... shed Mike's cave towards politicians, it will below invent the ... representation. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: The Gujjar Mutiny - the negative role of Meenas and a proposed solution
    ... given reservations. ... It rewards politicians who expand ... This whole notion of 'representation' and 'fair share' is pernicious. ... Representative government means government that is run by elected ...
    (soc.culture.indian)
  • Re: The Gujjar Mutiny - the negative role of Meenas and a proposed solution
    ... OBC quota. ... given reservations. ... It rewards politicians who expand ... caste must have proportional representation in government. ...
    (soc.culture.indian)
  • Re: Bush has killed the Rupublican party
    ... Party of 1993, that went in one general election, from 157 seats out ... perhaps we can get some political parties in power. ... A vote for a candidate in either major party is a vote for the ... Hoping that politicians have learned anything from past political ...
    (soc.men)
  • Re: Another party invitation...
    ... If the parents can't afford it, they pay for it themselves, AND do it in a manner they can afford. ... Look up the term "Potlatch" such expensive parties are imo often just a way of bragging about ones status, ... Corruption was widespread, the conglomerates dictated economic policy, and with few outstanding exceptions, politicians' reputations were low." ...
    (rec.food.cooking)