Re: The Trade Deficit, another view
- From: Mason A. Clark <masoncERASETHIS@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 06:16:13 GMT
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 03:45:48 -0700, "Phil Scott" <philscott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>There is a particial cure however... cut govt spending by 70%
>or so,
I'd be curious to know what you would cut. Work with the actual budget,
This may be useful:
http://masonc.home.netcom.com/big_govt.html
It shows how U.S. federal government expenditures having been going
steadily downward since 1955.
Is it just possible that what is needed is *greater* spending -- on the
infrastructure: levies, bridges, dams, energy independence, etc. etc.?
Mason C
.
- References:
- The Trade Deficit, another view
- From: William F Hummel
- Re: The Trade Deficit, another view
- From: Mason A . Clark
- Re: The Trade Deficit, another view
- From: Bill
- Re: The Trade Deficit, another view
- From: Phil Scott
- The Trade Deficit, another view
- Prev by Date: Re: Japan's Thriving Rustbelt
- Next by Date: Re: Debtor Nation, another view
- Previous by thread: Re: The Trade Deficit, another view
- Next by thread: Re: The Trade Deficit, another view
- Index(es):