Re: Economics

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:16:03 GMT, Mason C <masonc2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:36:59 +0100, Paul Burridge
><pb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Is this group about economics??
>
>Define "economics."

Okay, that's a good question! This is my personal definition unbiased
by any dictionary look-up:
"Economics is the systematic study of the inter-relationships between
money and capital flows, real assets, natural resources, labour, debt
and taxation at a personal, corporate, national and international
level."
Pretty comprehensive IMV. I'll bet someone will find fault with it,
though. :-)
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd" - William Blake
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Economics
    ... > by any dictionary look-up: ... > "Economics is the systematic study of the inter-relationships between ... The definition fails to differentiate economics from, say, either sociology ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: Economics
    ... > Okay, that's a good question! ... > by any dictionary look-up: ... > "Economics is the systematic study of the inter-relationships between ... > money and capital flows, real assets, natural resources, labour, debt ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Free to Lose
    ... decent prices no chaser allowed but is okay ... parking lot great idea much pref. ... The text of economics is as nasty as it wants to be: ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: Economics
    ... > schrieb ... > im Newsbeitrag ... >> Okay, that's a good question! ... > For me is economics, ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: Ive mentioned before that the way I see it
    ... Okay, so you admit you know nothing about economics. ... I'm sure the president knows much more than you, although it's true presidents in general know little, due to the fact that their talents lie elsewhere and they had not reason to make economics their focus. ... what goes around comes around, and a president that tells lies, like a lawyer that lies, is quick history. ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)