Re: The American Dream
- From: Les Cargill <lNOcargill@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:28:47 GMT
Quirk wrote:
Les Cargill wrote:
Quirk wrote:
Les Cargill wrote: Interesting, I'd like to see you demonstrate accessing the "information superhighway" byway of a Cisco router, without employing a desktop computer.
I do it daily.
Great! There is a senior citizens center nextdoor, I would love to instruct them in the use of the "information super highway" without a Desktop computer, primarily they would be interested in email (easy to use and spam filtered, of course), online shoping and banking, travel sites and viewing pictures and videos on various Baby and Wedding Blogs put up members of their families. Do you have some step-by-step instructions I could share with them on how they might do this without a Desktop computer? Or are you just taking nonsense?
The lack of a monitor is going to be a serious limitation for 'em. I work on Internet Protocol enabled embedded products that lack a graphics capability. They generally support ping, ftp, a few other protocols.
They also usually cost 100 times what a desktop would.
I suppose they could make do with ASCII art... there are drivers, these days...
I have to protest that you're efforts may result in depriving the elderly of one of the few truly great pleasures in life - complaining about progress.
And not all desktops run Doze.
You should have read a line two further:
And please don't tell me you do not have to run Windows on your desktop computer. I know, I am a long-time Linux user, developer, and advocate, the fact is that millions of computers had the Windows Rent included in their purchace price wether or not they actually ran Windows of because of the structure of the licencing deals Microsoft had with the PC Manufacturers.
So don't buy from those vendors. It's not like computers aren't ridiculously cheap, anyway.
Irrelevent, Bill Gates still recieved money every time one was sold by one of venders with "preloading agreements" wether or not they actually ran Windows. And, for over a decade, it was virtually impossible to buy a PC that didn't have the Windows Rent built into it's cost, especially if you needed an enterprise level volume retailer.
And that was hugely irrelevant prior to Linux. You're calling it "Windows Rent" when it's trivially circumvented.
Bill Gates was able to arrange contracts with computer vendors. What a concept!
>
I write programs which run on Windows (among other O/S-ii ) all the time that use no Microsoft tools at all.
By writing tools for Windows, you still increase the Rent Micros~1 is able to collect, wether or not you use their tools.
These are tools for computers, which in this case happen to be Windows. I don't care if they increase anybody's Evil Empire; I just wann'em to work.
Bill Gates's Bank account is an account of one of the biggest market failures in history.
It could easily have been Gary Kildall.
What I've read indicates he'd have rather flown his airplane.
Yeah, I've been hearing (and telling) that story for years too, according to Wikipedia some say it's a myth, but they don't offer any real proof of that, so I'm sticking to it ;)
Real pioneers get arrows in their backs. It's the carpetbaggers after that clean up. Why should computers be any different from, say, TV?
The market "wants" a defacto standard, and some hegemonist will give it to 'em.
Very good evidence exactly why M$ earned the bucks. They saw it - no wonder; Gates' mom being on the board and all.
Interesting! I've always heard she was their legal council, not on the board, where did you here that?
Hmmm.... probably Cringely. Actually, I heard it first around 1984 from a professor .
In anycase, there you have it, securing Rent collecting from a position of privilege. Pretty typical.
This example is pretty much why I remain skeptical. I think rent it actually a tradeoff. It happened with Sarnoff/RCA, Edison, Gates, Bell, Stanford....
It's pretty simple to extend R&D rent being "payment" for innovation to land rent being payment for ducal protection or pioneering. That the payment is out of proportion is another matter - such is our tradition.
In a perfect world, it would not be necessary. However....
Ballmer: "We had to protect the langauge ( interpeters & compilers ) business. "
Indeed, "protect" says it all.
Naw. The IBM/DOS deal fell in their lap, while Kildall apprently hid.
Rent-seekers don't "compete" they "protect."
Indeed; Bill Gates greatest "innovation" is his letter to Byte asserting IP rights over M$ code.
Cheers.
-- Les Cargill .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The American Dream
- From: Quirk
- Re: The American Dream
- References:
- Re: The American Dream
- From: Dan in Philly
- Re: The American Dream
- From: royls
- Re: The American Dream
- From: Les Cargill
- Re: The American Dream
- From: Quirk
- Re: The American Dream
- From: Les Cargill
- Re: The American Dream
- From: Quirk
- Re: The American Dream
- Prev by Date: Re: The Problem with Economics (was: Re: LVT: a discussion with a center/left economist)
- Next by Date: Re: A Hypothetical Disbursement Or Assignment Of Debt
- Previous by thread: Re: The American Dream
- Next by thread: Re: The American Dream
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|