Re: "The value of land is mostly improvements"
- From: Mark Monson <mmonson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:33:15 -0600
ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The value of land is mostly improvements (you know, such as buildings)
It depends on where you live. If you live in rural Montana where land sells for a couple thousand dollars per acre, the above is likely to be true. If you live in Manhattan, the polar opposite is true.
A building on a particular plot contributes nothing to unimproved value of the plot. Nearby improvements seem at first glance to boost land values but this theory fails closer examination. Tear down a chronically vacant building and surrounding land rents typically increase.
Land rents are supported by people in nearby buildings, not the buildings themselves.
MM .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "The value of land is mostly improvements"
- From: ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: "The value of land is mostly improvements"
- References:
- "The value of land is mostly improvements"
- From: sinister
- Re: "The value of land is mostly improvements"
- From: ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx
- "The value of land is mostly improvements"
- Prev by Date: Re: What can be done to curb illegal Mexican immigration
- Next by Date: Re: Leszek Kolakowski on the Marxian LTV
- Previous by thread: Re: "The value of land is mostly improvements"
- Next by thread: Re: "The value of land is mostly improvements"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading