Re: "The value of land is mostly improvements"
- From: "zzbunker" <zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Dec 2005 13:02:03 -0800
royls@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2005 16:44:40 -0800, "zzbunker" <zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> >The value of land is mostly improvements (you know, such as
> >> >buildings)
> >>
> >> It depends on where you live. If you live in rural Montana where land
> >> sells for a couple thousand dollars per acre, the above is likely to be
> >> true. If you live in Manhattan, the polar opposite is true.
> >
> > Manhattan doesn't have any land though.
> > It's got 20 miles of traffic jams and
> > and some tunnels in and out.
>
> Any experienced NY cabbie should be able to take you to vacant lots.
They are no experienced New York cabbies.
They hire those morons from Lonfon, rather than Boston.
Since, Brits, The Beatles, The Rolling Stones,
NYPD, and Donald Trrump are still the only people
on Earth sufficiently stupid
to buy vacant Elivis lots in New York City.
> > Since you can't even buy land in the entire city
> > of New York, since the entire city
> > in under George Steinbrener controlled rents.
>
> ?? Huh?
>
> -- Roy L
.
- References:
- "The value of land is mostly improvements"
- From: sinister
- Re: "The value of land is mostly improvements"
- From: ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: "The value of land is mostly improvements"
- From: zzbunker
- Re: "The value of land is mostly improvements"
- From: royls
- "The value of land is mostly improvements"
- Prev by Date: Re: Music industry rent-seekers go after lyrics web sites
- Next by Date: Why has the free market left South Americans poor
- Previous by thread: Re: "The value of land is mostly improvements"
- Next by thread: What are the disadvantages of depreciating in real terms
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|