Re: Where would we be without these important patents?



On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 02:44:55 -0000, "Andy F." <never.mind@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

"nospam" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:JKWdne-jtsfgYYjZnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Andy F. wrote:

That would mean a lot of inventors would be out of a job.

From where you got this idea ? The scientists and engineers are employed
to
design a product. The company will have the full right to use this
designs.

But without exclusive use of the designs, the firm won't make enough profits
to justify paying the inventors' wages.

Such claims are common, but false and ridiculous. Do you think no
inventor was ever paid wages before there were patents? Give your
head a shake.

It would be more profitable to wait
until someone else invented a new product and then copy them.

No, that is also flat, outright wrong, because then you are behind the
market. Whoever comes out with the product first has a chance to sell
to those who want the product most, and thus sell at a higher price.
Waiting until someone else has a successful product just gets you more
intense competition, customers who do not want the product enough to
buy it right away, and consequently a lower price.

Your claims are flat wrong, as are all the attempts to rationalize
monopoly IP privileges.

However, if during this work a invention,innovation,genial idea pops up
this
is the creation of the inventor and it must be his or her own property.
Assuming exclusive ownership of somebody else creation is just plain
looting.

It's not looting. Patents only become the property of companies because the
inventors agree to that.

In a sense. Inventors know they have little chance against corporate
legal departments if they invent independently.

-- Roy L
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Where would we be without these important patents?
    ... But without exclusive use of the designs, the firm won't make enough profits ... to justify paying the inventors' wages.It would be more profitable to wait ... is the creation of the inventor and it must be his or her own property. ... It's not looting. ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: Where would we be without these important patents?
    ... But without exclusive use of the designs, ... to justify paying the inventors' wages. ... Technological progress has been a lot faster since patents were introduced. ... It's not looting. ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: Where would we be without these important patents?
    ... The scientists and engineers are ... But without exclusive use of the designs, ... to justify paying the inventors' wages. ... Technological progress has been a lot faster since patents were ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: Where would we be without these important patents?
    ... But without exclusive use of the designs, ... to justify paying the inventors' wages. ... Technological progress has been a lot faster since patents were introduced. ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: Uploading PDFs of railroad modeling magazines (scans) - inappropriate?
    ... nature, it would seem that there are different situations that might apply. ... For a long time I've wondered about the disparity in length between rights given to inventors and authors/artists/composers. ... Why should an author get a lifetime plus whatever years protection for their creation while an inventor gets a mere 20 years of exclusive control of their creation. ... As for your comment about reproducing something which is no longer on the market, I've seen people try to use that to justify copying old software games, like Wizardry or Ultima. ...
    (rec.models.railroad)