Re: novel argument against taxing rents
- From: royls@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 03:25:01 GMT
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 19:43:05 -0400, Robert Vienneau
<rvien@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <yIednadeDqkxrKbZnZ2dnUVZ_t2dnZ2d@xxxxxxx>, "tonyp"
<tonyp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some people want heroin, hookers, or hip-hop. Pushers, pimps, and punks
are
therefore productive? Okay.
I think Rosa Luxemburg, writing from quite a different tradition,
used priests, prostitutes, and publishers of liberal newspapers
as her canonical examples of unproductive labor.
She has a point with the latter, as they rarely show a profit. But I
can't imagine why she would have put prostitutes in such unsavory
company....
-- Roy L
.
- References:
- Re: novel argument against taxing rents
- From: Les Cargill
- Re: novel argument against taxing rents
- From: tonyp
- Re: novel argument against taxing rents
- From: royls
- Re: novel argument against taxing rents
- From: tonyp
- Re: novel argument against taxing rents
- From: ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: novel argument against taxing rents
- From: tonyp
- Re: novel argument against taxing rents
- From: Robert Vienneau
- Re: novel argument against taxing rents
- Prev by Date: Re: novel argument against taxing rents
- Next by Date: Re: econophysics
- Previous by thread: Re: novel argument against taxing rents
- Next by thread: Re: novel argument against taxing rents
- Index(es):