Re: Definition of "rich"?


""Peter Bjørn Perlsø"" <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1he2mw6.1wli9kk4d5294N%peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
sinister <sinister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

""Peter Bjørn Perlsø"" <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1he2ear.q620ffwo88rpN%peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Just Cocky <just@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The socialists invented that one as a pejorative way of characterizing
libertarians. Because socialists want to abolish private property,
they like to demonize those who oppose their views. Don't bother it
them as they are just being retarded as usual.

I didn't get much out of that webpage, either. "geolibertarian" seems
like a new monicker for the Georgists that want to tax land and rent.

You're avoiding the question.

Do you think private agents should have the right to deny others the
right
of access to natural resources in exchange for nothing, or don't you?

Access to natural resources is not a right, so, yes, I believe they
should have such powers.

If there's no right to access natural resources, why is there a right to
control natural resources?

--
regards, Peter Bjørn Perlsø
http://haxor.dk
http://liberterran.org
http://haxor.dk/fanaticism/


.

Loading