Re: Definition of "rich"?

Just Cocky <just@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Posession of natural resources is a natural relationship arising between
humans and the land/resources. Nothing untoward about that.


I don't deny the natural relationship between Human and Nature. What I
deny is that there are moral arguments for the completely exclusionary
use of natural resources at all times. As such, this relationship
cannot be interpreted as a right, in the moral sense. It can still be
a right in the political sense for the reasons outline above, though.

My question is just this: Who would you have stewarding the equal
distribution of, if not the resources/lands themselves, the the rent
value or part of the profits from the resources/lands?


Ultimately, whoever has the biger guns!

In an organized society, I'm pretty sure the people would delegate
that job to whatever Government they had.

I'll make sure I have a rocket launcher for when the slavers come
knockin'

--
regards, Peter Bjørn Perlsø
http://haxor.dk
http://liberterran.org
http://haxor.dk/fanaticism/
.

Quantcast