Re: Definition of "rich"?

Peter Bjørn Perlsø <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<royls@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:53:49 +0200, peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Bj=F8rn_Perls=F8?=) wrote:

<royls@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Without a right to access natural resources, no other right can exist.
So you contend that the private owners of natural resources have
rights, but other people do not. OK.

Absolute nonsense.

It is fact.

BTW, roy, it's pretty appearent that we'll agree when hell freezes over,
so why don't we just stop here?

--
regards, Peter Bjørn Perlsø
http://haxor.dk
http://liberterran.org
http://haxor.dk/fanaticism/
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Definition of "rich"?
    ... -- Roy L ... Absolute nonsense. ... I contend that humans have a right to their life, ... But people do NOT have rights to the property of others. ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: Unnatural Acts of Opera
    ... BTW, what about the rights issue here? ... ROFL. ... the people who run opera podcasts are completely ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)
  • OT: Bratzi and his friends
    ... You and Iranian President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, share ... You're both psychos. ... BTW: ... your rights to free speech. ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: How you can remove articles from GoogleGroups archive
    ... >>> If not you are nothing more than a liar yourself Roy Schestowitz. ... >>> BTW I don't care what anyone finds about me on Usenet or anywhere else ... Whether I care about the subject lines is another matter. ...
    (alt.internet.search-engines)
  • Re: Oh goodie............more reading material delivered to the group.bwahahahaaaaaa
    ... BTW, I did notice the forgery, but there was nothing he hadn't puked ... You let me know when you & Roy are going to duke it out. ... The people who've been doing the most mouth running here are you and ...
    (rec.models.rockets)