Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Robert Kolker <nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 08:02:47 -0500
Peter Bjørn Perlsø wrote:
Yada yada. All you constantly claim is that your position is
selv-evident and blah blah, while I could say the same for mine.
The only self evident things are logical tautologies. There are no self-evident facts. Every fact has to be pried loose from nature by the work of observing and measuring. At the very least a fact must be paid for by the effort of mental concentration. Facts are never self evident and they are rarely free.
Bob Kolker
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: royls
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- References:
- Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: sinister
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: sinister
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: sinister
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: royls
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: royls
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Definition of "rich"?
- Prev by Date: Re: Definition of "rich"?
- Next by Date: Re: Definition of "rich"?
- Previous by thread: Re: Definition of "rich"?
- Next by thread: Re: Definition of "rich"?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|