Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: royls@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 16:56:10 GMT
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 14:37:40 +0200, peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Bj=F8rn_Perls=F8?=) wrote:
<royls@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:14:14 +0200, peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Bj=F8rn_Perls=F8?=) wrote:
<royls@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:08:57 +0200, peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Bj=F8rn_Perls=F8?=) wrote:
JWith anything government comes waste, favoritism,
populism and nepotism.
And that would be different from non-governmental institutions how,
exactly?
Effeciency, which the markets brings, by punishing those wasteful.
The market is a very slow and uncertain punisher of waste,
Hardly slower than at democratic government.
Nevertheless slow enough to prove those problems are hardly unique to
government.
and all the
evils you attribute to government above also thrive in the private
sector.
Yeah, lets see a private enterprise keep on running when it has an debt
of 8+ trillion US$. (snicker)
Relative to its revenue and assets, that is a smaller debt than some
corporations carry.
Some things markets can do better than governments. But
other things, governments do better than markets.
However, soi-disant libertarians typically refuse to know all facts
about market failures, externalities, public goods, free riders, etc.
The more you write in this group, the more I'm convinced that you're not
a libertarian by any means of the imagination. Hence, you're only
causing ridicule to your own label of "geolibertarianism".
I don't really care about such labels until they are precisely
defined.
But anyway, if you want to be educated about these alleged problems with
free markets (and free sociaties), do read on:
http://www.mises.org/story/1035
http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/5_4/5_4_6.pdf
These articles are both garbage.
I was reading Mises when you were still in diapers.
-- Roy L
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- References:
- Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: sinister
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: sinister
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: sinister
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: royls
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: royls
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: royls
- Re: Definition of "rich"?
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Definition of "rich"?
- Prev by Date: Re: A question for the "Geolibertarians"
- Next by Date: Re: Definition of "rich"?
- Previous by thread: Re: Definition of "rich"?
- Next by thread: Re: Definition of "rich"?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|