Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields

New York is feeling to me like a Gethsemani, which means that _method_ is
still in the making. Very different from New York when I arrived.
Following THAT logic, that PARTICULAR set of instructions of how to apply
the whole process of sacrifice, I will be exposed to... the apostles. That
is, those who look like me and have to be distinguished from me.
Gethsemani have the sense of leaving ALONE the god-in-the-making, the
PRODUCER OF VALUE so that he can be distinguished and finally _accused_ by
the future priesthood, those (from Veracruz) who want to take advantage
of THIS, THIS WRITING AND OTHER MATERIAL. ALone means that in three years
I have seen being _sacrificed_, passing by me, friends, lovers (!?),
could-have-been-lovers, FAMILY in more than one flavour, UNDISCLOSED
family, may-be family, could-be-friends, supporters, confused people
(schizos and not schizos), sheer witnesses and others I may have missed,
under varying conditions that dont incentive interaction, proclamation
without direct benefit, in the hands of the future-yet-to-be priesthoos of
a sacreificed star-god. (See below, but translate god-in-the-making for
[commercial] star to bring the whole discussion to modern times).

Today it has the effect of suggesting that I will find later those who are
the real enemies! Those who are profiting, profited, could have profited
or worse, the new priesthood. IT all has a flavour of generating guilt
(see Guilt of Atonement) to have tools to surround and profit...

The god-in-the-making ultimately is turned into The Prophet, the man
shouting a truth about events and catastrophes and consequences few people
know of NOW, witnesses turned martyrs or diasporated, godmakers clustered
around the god-image enjoying their profits, enjoying the favors of the
Believers, the new congreggation forming around the story that, as
winners, they proclaim to those who hear. Note that their.god has to be
made unavailable, otherwise the initiates would lose their newly won
privileges. But the god-to-be cannot be totally wasted! He (or she...) is
the real source, the engine. A hope would be there that he goes spent,
nothing new coming from him that can be profited. THEN, the last and next
obvious and rational step is to... sacrifice him. Unsacrificed he is
treated as a prophet, a shouter, the (almost) divine Madman, the madman of
the Tarot (last card in the sequence of Major Arcana, which speaks, very
obviously, of the result of THAT plot that inspired the Tarot) at the
brink of a precipice but still representing pure creativity...

A metamorph fantasy believable even for very esceptic (but not trained)
people. The person.product then person.scenario provides a last step:
person.goal, the man into which the victim can be turned BY sacrificing
the person.scenario! Total cancellation: canibalism as the final threat
and solution... Final victim vitimizing the initial victim and final
sacrifice to the godmakers now full priesthood, ready to _profit_ from the
proceedings of the whole Plot, the fight between, lets call it
evil-admitted-god and good-god-in-the-making, that they, first would-be
priesthood, now, at this point, totally sacred and righteouss witnesses,
organized for their own benefit.

It is only essential that all those witnesses,
all those who KNOW of the god-in-the-making as distinct from the admitted
new god, who know of the god-in-the-making as REAL VALUE, AND all those
who DO realize the confusion, the godmakers who stick to the
god-in-the-making but were unable to take advantage from him, either as
honest value seekers or as devious would-be priests, be TOTALLY AND
FINALLY SILENCED beyond redemption! ARMAGEDDON! Else priesthoods would
fight and not settle down! This is the danger that established religions,
priesthoods, realize of the process, their reaction not being determined
but by the will to oppose the whole process! Anticipated but unknown
reaction that can be treated as normal political maneuvers, not as hidden
war, dirty war or cosa nostra (our thing of which only US know, not
necessarily associated to crime). In prosaic terms, it means an alliance
to organized religiosity, the remnant of a distant struggle, or profiting
from one He... or real opposition to organized priesthood to form a real,
new Church... the outcome depends on _exactly_ what is the value that the
Creative Man provides, the exact worth that turns a **normal** man into a
god-in-the-making and how it can be profited from it! In the end it is a
for profit endeavour what moves the whole process, a struggle to be the
fortunate ones partaking of the creative man s future worth (net present
value, +/- the v in the double entendre thread). The bigger that perceived
value, the bigger the whole issue will be, the more people involved, the
harder the struggle. It is in Carroll and many other literature works:
Humpty Dumpty stating that what matters is who s Master.



[[And a man just passed by saying: he lies if he says he cant write in the
library... who lies? Issue seems to be COMFORT. An ignorant if he means
me... edit boxes versus DTP systems... I cant even see more than one
paragraph at the same time, lacking also the freedom and liberty of
writing the whole day. Otherwise, _he_ is lying, another play-move in the
game of pretending this writer is not writing this...]]

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore

.