Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: "FabrizioJBonsignore" <djbonsignore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:10:57 -0500
Si te llamo no me cuelgues. Me cuesta mucho trabajo hacer llamadas y si
tenemos que hablar lo mas largo y tendido que se pueda.
Is this the Qu ran (Koran, Quran)? 007.069.494v It speaks of illegal sex,
silk shirts, (non metabolic?) alcohol and musical instruments as being
unlawful! I am wary of translations. And then of second hand deivery of
thoughts. So it says, **somebody** heard somebody else saying that maybe
it could be inferred that ... is that the reason why musicians usually
have so brutal lives?
I wonder since when joto in Mexican refers to homosexuals. I have a jota,
J, in my name! Which distinguishes me from my name being simply Italian.
Was that denomination used before my seventh year? Or before I was born? I
think I doubt it...
-He fit into the cube!
-Yeah, but you had to leave head, arms and legs outside...
So suddenly you find old professor X in another city, another country,
posing as a befuddled homeless man. YOu dont know what he is doing there,
you dont know who is the guy nearby and the funny girl just averts her
eyes. You dont know if he is kidnapped, went snap, is hiding or maybe it
is poetic justice because he did try to steal the Alive and Human and
maybe you managed to inform the publisher in time. What do you do, besides
saying he is X? Do you call the police, try to make friends, run to tell
everybody, speak with the guy, try to laid down the girl, wait for another
day to find him?
From the main point being that of thought being transmitted and recognizedas very small differences of information (bits), between local, internal
working of the brain as patterns of electrical impulses and the influence
of external signals, it can be understood that details such as the pitch
of a voice being heard are transmitted in compact form and can be easily
lost in the transmission (lossy transmission), but given adequate
resonators, already trained, the sparse bits that transmit that
information will make sense, will complete a previous pattern in a gestalt
way (no doubt the original inspiration for that psychology) if the voice
has already been hear and is common in the experience of the hearer. But
then external voices are not know by people! What he hear is the inner
voice, the pitch that goes complexly through the ears and the vocal organs
to form what we consider is our voice. Those two voices will be different,
the external one and the inner one, but ALSO, for pure thought being
transmitted, a third, inner-inner voice can be conceived, that will be
different from the other two and would not by known by the emissor! That
voice mirrored back by another mind would not be recognized at all, making
the problem of recognizing the origin of voices much more difficult. Any
inference as to who is the emissor given the pitch of a voice, the quality
of one voice being recognizable, would be a total illusion and
inconclusive... though it is possible to infer too that unless pure memory
is used, that is, the voice that is heard is being retransmitted from real
sound OR it goes through a (dementia like) walkie talkie, there, SOME
effort would be noticeable at faking a voice or a particular voice quality
(which in that case would transmit more information as part of the message
being that quality the message itself). For instance, a characteristic
slowness due to the creative synthesis processing of a pitch or pauses
during a phrase or other distorsions would point to a fake voice,
including fantasy qualities like that of scratch, or historical sound
periods, etc.
NOte that one feasible solution to schizophrenia defined as a neurosis
caused by the _unwilling_ reception of direct brain thoughts, is that of
taking medication. Antipsichotics were developed to stop voices from being
heard. But voices are caused by people, someplace. Even if some or all
people can emit directed throught willingly or unwillingly, if nobody can
hear them, the problem is solved. Those medications would then be adequate
for involuntary telepathic reception, what can be explained as
particularly sensitive, tuned brains with such dynamics that they act as
all-time-on radios, picking up and interpreting as speech the information
transmitted through EM and such **informationally** ordered fields nearby
coming from other brains (carrier signals). This form of telepathy should
be distinguished from the direct contact of string minds. The former can
be considered automatic and would be blocked by antipsychotics,
essentially ruining addressing and self addressing, while the latter would
be unblockable but opened to very strong signals or signals within a
carrier. Note that there is complex plane map for these phenomena, so even
an opaque brain would be able to _hear_ a voice if it is specifically
directed, is a string signal and occurrs within a carrier field...
(Bluntly, if you hear voices and dont take antipsychotics, dont
complain!).
I went to my program to qualify for state assistance. It is not providing
the kind of offseting help to offset all those thefts and plots and
machinations... at all.
A cartoon. The main character is addressing the audience. Behind him
another character is attracting attention. Passes behind, makes faces,
multiplies itself, makes jokes, goes so far that it falls, makes noise, it
is a disaster! And the main character doesnt notice. What would you do,
what is the message, should the second character by acknowledged? I think
I saw Agustin Montiel as a messenger, maybe the origin of the Mazinger
nickname. Maybe he was also victim of the same mechanism or otherwise I
dont understand. He was not really my friend though we did discuss fnatasy
business, the fad being export import companies at the time, to be located
in the WTC, then Hotel de Mexico. When the name of Lu is began being
PUSHED on me I remembered people belonging to the military. I thought he
was MExican army as well as his father, but I am not sure, we spoke just
two or three times. Going to the university was full time then and quite
difficult being the beginning of the career. Seems he switched to
accountancy... I dont know if he is still around. Or what was his purpose.
Etc. THis is now an open letter, I am still being ignored and I dont know
who has the answers... but my situations are totally artificial given my
efforts and the theft of my music and programming. Some people in this
world are BIG, HUHE FARSANTS DEFRAUDING OTHER PEOPLE WITH MY WORKS AND
EFFORTS. Agustin was not exactly my friend but there was nothing for me to
suspect he did some wrong against me.
Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore
.
- Prev by Date: Re: A question about the great depression
- Next by Date: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- Previous by thread: Re: A question about the great depression
- Next by thread: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
