Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields

Yes, creationists refuting anthropopalentology are refuted by the
historical sociology of human remains. Newly Rational beings would not
know clearly what to do with remains once death is recognized since the
instict to handle remains would be absent or superseded by new
possibilities and hypothesis. Having no predators of any species and being
able to keep at bay most animal species (particularly after any form of
agriculture developed), disposing of corpses turns into a very immediate
and all important problem.

(copy of post above)
There is a link between the Acapulco Fest 2000 and this mess I still dont
understand. IS there any list of attendants to that festival? I was
playing in the terrace and the music would come from the other side of
the
bay! Maybe an illusion... but now that I think of it somebody may have
been in the same luxury hotel with a sampler. That is why I said that In
the womb and thinks to come was the leftover of that party, the main
theme
being inspired by whales in heat. When I finally knew how to record I
couldnt recover the whole theme. I didnt care much about the music then,
I
was just exploring the instrument, even looking for somebody to help me
learn its lore... but I found nobody, save for one guy who called later
in
Mexico but didnt show up. Maybe he was intercepted too? I didnt want him
to know I was in the office but I give him clear instructions on how to
find me but didnt arrive. I was unable to make any real contact, but then
I assumed things would remain more or less the same; they didnt, less
than
one month after I was looking for a new job while struggling with a
blocked toilet...

I wrote SETI Project when I was writing the thread about remote vision
and
of course there was no reply. The argument is easy: vision systems
project
a four dimensional (?) reality on a two dimensional plane. It ends up at
some point as a series of two dimensional mappings of Reality that are
further processed to get any meaning that particular brain needs to
survive. This two dimensional mapping (necessary per se because of the
lineal nature of light), would be reproduced by brains as a necessity
here
on Earth and in other systems, that is, this is true for all possible
vision (light) systems, in which to preserve spatial relations as input
for processing a two dimensional mapping would be developed THEN thought.
This mappings would be transmisible in space and received in adequately
prepared receptors. So SETI looking for lineal signals would miss
intergalactic TV, not of machines but of brains, brains from other
species
because if they transmit (and they would transmit specifically to other
planets and species s brains), they would transmit information in that
particular 2m mapping of brains processing information through
connectionist systems.

(Would it make sense to use sparse grids of receptors with angled inner
receptors as visual receptors? The argument is the same, the lineal
nature
of light would impact the inner receptors with rays coming linearly from
the correct angle, making the raw input more complex, but even then
things
**in front of** and **behind of** would still be in the same spatial
relations covering light reflected from behind, though of course for
strong EM radiation some of those things would be invisible and rays
would
still be lineal).

I dont know where else to complain,

AS IF: you have an idea, a prejudice of a reality. If you want to
**prove** some instance of Nature exemplifies that particular idea, you
just have to make that thing exhibit the characteristics that distinguish
the idea s reality from other realities! But history and memory will be
different if that instance IS actually an instance exemplifying that
reality than if it is made to be AS IF it has always been an instance of
that idea. The historical path will be different and there will be other
characteristics in the instance that will speak of it. So the idea has to
be considered Ideal only, an abstraction that may be filled out
completely
or not, but which can be exemplified multiple ways by multiple instances
of Reality. So an object can be said to be X even if it is not X! By
making it exhibit some characteristics of X-being-ness to the judge,
characteristics which can be totally external and not inherent to the
object or to its reality. Side effects. To avoid this logical trap the
instance has to be inspected historically, in itself and in relation to
its contextS to determine whether its X-ness is inherent (thing is
actually an X) or circumstancial and purposefully X-ed, made to have some
characteristics of X to look as if it was X. This discussion is all
important once the phenomenon of schizophrenically (telepathically)
induced bioterrorism and other activities are acknowledged and recognized
as such in social studies and other studies involving people. The
importance of this phenomenon is derived from the fact that motivations
in
schizophrenics are not related directly to explainable (for the time
being
observable) reasonings, but have their origin in distant events or facts,
some or all of which may be fantasy or ouright deceptions. This is what
is
known as delusions; for schizophrenics delusions are real since it is the
easiest, cost effective way to process the messages sent by unidentified
minds, irrespective of their matching with some reachable or not reality.
If it cannot be easily verified as true, its truthfulness is assumed and
used as axioms for further decision making. This category of unverified
(for that particular individual unverifiable) realities is always bigger
than the category of observable and verifiable realities for any
biological being! [true also for Irrational beings, the sound of the
distant helicopter sampling is for the Irrational being as real a monster
as the car moving just in front of it] By considering the existence of
purposeful and involuntary telepathy delusions are explained as the
products of other minds being considered truth and meaningful by the
receiving mind. [Considerations of potency and order are also relevant
here].

I think that after this discussions, Churches should emit appropriate
documents stating that voices heard in schizophrenia are not gods, nor
angels, nor demons, nor God nor suprarealities, but very easily
explainable transmissions from human beings and other existent and live
beings. There are no big secrets in the channel, nothing that cannot be
researched or investigated or deduced by human beings, which is another
way to say that the Universe is ordered and not perverse, perversion
being
a moral category only reachable after having consciousness of good and
evil OR of usefulness, which is the correct category to judge
perversion...

I still have no money, no resources. Without money you are reduced to a
slug, a snail going up a wood stick.

From this discussions a theory of feasible political structures can be
derived as explaining political structures in their historical
development
and also (pending more research) explain all possible political
structures...

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
    ... a four dimensional reality on a two dimensional plane. ... would be reproduced by brains as a necessity here ... because if they transmit (and they would transmit specifically to other ... (Would it make sense to use sparse grids of receptors with angled inner ...
    (sci.econ)
  • What if ???
    ... and it might explain why "reality" at the quantum ... their history, by our constant observation and focus upon them: ... also begin to find evidence for this as if the energy/information in our ... the "Jack the Ripper" case as an example of the 'uncertainty principle' ...
    (talk.philosophy.misc)
  • Re: The Age to Marry In Medieval England
    ... Anyone on this forum can make a statement and it is fact until challenged, unless of course it flies in the face of reality. ... Renia: OK, King Harold was killed by getting an arrow in the eye at the Battle of Hastings. ... This is the nature of history. ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)
  • Re: Objective Anti-Intellectualism
    ... or even comprehensible without serious math ... gives every indication that it is closing in on reality. ... Our brains give indications of deciding something before we are aware ... our interpretations of ordinary perceptions can be off. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: times online on bnp
    ... The BNP lacks both, it woudl appear. ... rather than reality. ... So you think it's more important that books presented as history "make ... reality for politics. ...
    (uk.politics.misc)