Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: Bob Kolker <nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:38:16 -0500
royls@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:27:07 -0500, Bob Kolker <nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
royls@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
As you know, I've already refuted you: the rules determine who gets
the gold.
Not so. The rules are broken with impunity by those with enough force to back them.
But that's power, stupid, not gold.
Look at Gaius Julias Ceasar. He crossed the Rubicon with his Legions and it was against the rules. But he got away with it.
Until the Ides of March...
The Augustus got away with it by becomeing the first king of Rome in over 500 years.
And Caesar's family had got rich from the rules, which was what
allowed him to attain command of legions in the first place.
That is because Ceasar's family -made- the rules by which they got rich.
Bob Kolker
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: royls
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- References:
- more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: sinister
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: sinister
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: royls
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: Les Cargill
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: royls
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: Les Cargill
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: royls
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: Les Cargill
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: royls
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: Les Cargill
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: royls
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: royls
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- From: royls
- more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- Prev by Date: Re: Magnetic field -- electrical machinery1st, static magnetic field1)
- Next by Date: Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- Previous by thread: Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- Next by thread: Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|