Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists

<royls@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Right. My bad.

?? So, which premise?

That the state has an immaculate conception that happened as a contract
between society and a coercive agency.



Again, my bad. I mean initiation of coercion (force, theft and it's
corollary, fraud).

Please explain why government must necessarily initiate coercion under
circumstances where a PDA would necessarily _not_ do so.

Because PDAs are hired, while states are agressors that give themselves
the privilege of monopoly on justice taxation and violence. This is
pretty basic stuff, Roy.


Thought not.

No, occasionally you don't, evidently.

--
regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog
http://markedspartiet.dk, http://macplanet.dk
http://siad.dk
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
    ... favored by anarchists will eventually combine until a monopoly position ... Please explain why government must necessarily initiate coercion under ... circumstances where a PDA would necessarily _not_ do so. ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
    ... favored by anarchists will eventually combine until a monopoly position ... Please explain why government must necessarily initiate coercion under ... circumstances where a PDA would necessarily _not_ do so. ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists
    ... That the state has an immaculate conception that happened as a contract ... between society and a coercive agency. ... Please explain why government must necessarily initiate coercion under ... circumstances where a PDA would necessarily _not_ do so. ...
    (sci.econ)