Re: more electoral defeats for the feudalists

On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 21:22:45 +0100, peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Bj=F8rn_Perls=F8?=) wrote:

<royls@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Right. My bad.

?? So, which premise?

That the state has an immaculate conception that happened as a contract
between society and a coercive agency.

I must have missed the part where anyone advanced such a premise.
Society can't make contracts. It has no competence to do so. That's
one reason governments are needed: they _can_ make contracts.

Again, my bad. I mean initiation of coercion (force, theft and it's
corollary, fraud).

Please explain why government must necessarily initiate coercion under
circumstances where a PDA would necessarily _not_ do so.

Because PDAs are hired, while states are agressors that give themselves
the privilege of monopoly on justice taxation and violence.

Thanks for the expected non sequitur.

This is pretty basic stuff, Roy.

It's also nothing but fairy dust, with absolutely no logical or
factual basis.

-- Roy L
.

Loading