Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields

SOOOO! The Church uses telepathy to generate schizophrenia and uses it very
circumstantially to the convenience of the sacred owners OR would be
owners of church property. Without science any kind of abuse and beliefs
can be generate around it, including psychiatry and psychology as myths.
An ANTITELEPATHIC or ANTIPSYCHOTIC would be essential and subject to
religious prohibition! BUt also any telepathic or schizophrenic input!
Will depend on the strength of the church and the ideas it has about it.
Wine would have been considered a telepathic or a schizophrenic in the low
middle ages (no ISO), so it was forbidden by both. The ideal is a single
telepath to implement the Egyptian theocracy and gold era again
(Byzantium). This corner solution, a single one, only leads to a
theocratic tyranny, while the other corner solution of all telepaths leads
only to a loss of civilization (Precolumbian Indians; their civilizations
are an example of synarchic theocracies full of telepaths). Now it is
drugs that are considered as a doctrine to be related to drugs. But the
relation is complex. I wonder, are people who live near the oceans more
pronoe to look lide DEVILS? Coast people eating fish and SOME sort of
fats? So THC seems to be an antitelepathic! But the State ideology and
that of those who see it only as a monopolic business is that it is
telepathic! No studies on this side, but if it concentrates brain activity
in the mesencephalous it is antitelepathic and would provide for the
development of strong concepts of self! The Church and courts, the police,
will support its ban as it provides easy inquisitorial like sacrifices and
easy explanations. It is not clear that it would change people s faces
into that of devils, which in that case would be true also for diets full
of fat precursors to metabolic THC... IT IS VERY CONVENIENT NOT TO HAVE
REAL SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ON THIS MATTER! Or to make it freely available.
Some schizos believe it is antischizophrenic, therefore they promote it;
others believe it is antitelepathic and thus promote it. The Church
upholds the ban as it allows to have devils to sacrifice, prejudices to
sacrifice, the bad and crime that come with a forced ban on a basic
need... and diverts the look of the State toward the long term goal of
going back to very well established theocracies. The real problem is
faking side effects, that of making it look as if... as if it was worse
than necessary, more evil than necessary, more obvious than necessary,
more notorious than necessary, more important than necessary, easy tag...
for which telepathy and schizophrenia are again the perfect tool... again,
a doctrine supporting the church, drugs dealing acquiring the
characteristics of a church BUT associated to the evil, the devil. It is
important to the Church to have a narcosatanic, devil Church, even if for
the State and the people it is a net loss, more for the people as it has
SIDE EFFECTS AND SIDE EFFECTS. Everybody is a victim, a necessary victim
to the other parties so that it be evident. And of course for the big
dealers and those who promoted and uphold the ban, for people dependent on
laws like the Rockefeller drug laws, legalization is unecessary. A good
oppportunity to throw and exercise the mechanisms of telepathy and
schizophrenia...

Who went to the United Nations when I was pubishing in LA? That boy that
was in Grand Central Terminal was not the man I call Luis Bistrain and he
is not I.

Who went to the White House? I dont intend to go there unless I am
specifically invited, but that invitation is not arriving since there is
somebody in the middle. Is that the reason for so many buses and
humiliations?

Ha! No public enterprise, no LLC nor SA nor GbmH in any of those religious
books and their terminated, ended, final realities...

**Please! Somebody bring down the cross that poor man! Dont you see he is
being tortured? What happened to human rights and animal rights? Are you
taking his place? Who do you want to be, the man putting him there, the
man on the cross or the people watching it and saying Ohhh!? Instead of
all those serious and modern men in a tax financed public legal court**
(should be script, as a literary resource).

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore

.

Relevant Pages