Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields

Park, parque: para-que, what for? Isnt this the main question in public
finances solved nowadays by environmentalism and ecology? The word s
etimology in both languages is very clear seen under this explaining
principle. Note that the Spanish phrase pA-ra-quE would get a single
accent when pronounced as an English speaker, pAr-(a)-k(e), unaccented
vowels lost in a gutural pronunciation. The sense of direction goes from
the first to the second language, a long discussed decision to form a park
being mocked by populus as para que? and translated and understood later
(or simultaneously) as park: a rather useless piece of urban furniture,
completely unnecessary for people with big houses and totally
misunderstood by people in the people, but understandable by those in
between in a growing urban economy. A comparative analysis of city records
for several cities along inspection of the literature would be able to
find the time an place when gardens turned into parks, a fine distinction
grown from a more diversified growing socioeconomy.

Nezendo and neceando: bolts and silly stuborness (fool insisting), a
Finnish Spaniard argument, modernly exemplified in the comics of Uderzo,
the silly bard insisting in making his music be heard. The word necio for
fool does have a certain nordic quality, as it can be substituted by
tonto, fool, but fools, necios, are stubborn too, they insist and it is
the insistence what makes them fools. It speaks of a very **stubborn**
stance in not hearing! It can be imagined a famous argument between some
Finnish and some Spaniard, the Finnish sending them **bolts**, jolts, what
some now refer as shots in an attempt at confusing realities (bullet,
jolt, syringe...), while the Spaniard turning the repeated word into the
equivalent of tonto, fool... but maybe the fool was the man who was necio
enough not to understand that the other was not neceando but sending
nezendo...? A particular historical incident may be found by following the
use of necio in Spaniard literature.

Wouldnt really imagine it, a security breach in university... the real man
didnt arrive, but his identity was established in the university records
at the very beginning... I dont remember their procedures, but certainly
in Mexico it is very easy to get a photo identification and Lu is didnt
have it. I think he used an identification from a syndicate... it was
meant to be something very temporal. But then waht happened to the really
real Lu is, not the one (phenotype) I met and entertained (literally, as I
was the cantakerous guy), but the guy who was BORN under that name? They
dont want to understand: I lived with a mess of names being the same to
me; having it unified was losing a lot of stress, not interested in
becoming somebody else because a group of professional troublemakers were
creating mass self esteem complexes! So if they identified themselves to
the what? biggest genius of the XXI century? to the point of changing
their name, then they WILL identify themselves again to the accusation of
being dumb for doing it! I think his last apparition was with teens and a
long white beard like his other clone. THis was being written for law
enforcers, now the audience is not clear, but I am still victim, victim of
a continued crime of a particular form and intent. The more I am not paid
attention the more authorities are letting it compound and becoming guilty
themselves. The police had to provide many more certainties as to what
names they were using and where... So now? Two governments passed by. And
my suspicious are being semt by email, not reported here.

One thousand notes is still one thousand notes ordered out of an infinite
space of possiblities and they cant be the same one thousand notes again.
It is my thousand notes now with them. There were more than one thousand
notes in my hard drive. I do have the lead to the code.

Coalition for the Homeless, should I say I broke all windows to force
somebody to go and brake them so he can say he is I? A little bit late.

I do try to establish a relation with the Ombudsman office.

The Mindworm algorythm is a nice title for another thread, though it would
need to be thought out first before writing it down. Self conscious
processes. Dual control. Its genetic.

I think those guys would be discussing what comes next in the unexpected
theory of man s evolution that was coming out of this threads. The origin
of race is one of the continuation for the essay Futures of Man: the
Speciation Process. Incidentally the mindworm would be too another
continuation for that series. I wonder if extorters are still around with
false accusations?

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore

.

Quantcast