Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: "FabrizioJBonsignore" <djbonsignore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:01:27 -0500
Just heard the lyrics, something about love, then all his children are
insane. A variation on the doors, with some synth pad and discordant
singing. What my music is traded for.
It is disgusting that my hard drive was switched by a relative of the same
high school Spaniard **boy** who sent me to the hospital an basically made
my school somewhat miserable, because he was applying schizophrenic
mechanisms like false accusations and unduly competition. It makes me
think his notorious aggresiveness was derived from sexual assault by his
family, homosexual incest, making go through extreme expressions to affirm
his maleness. I think that **boy** would be the most affected by any
success of mine and the most happy to make me go through this miserable
experience. So... his father is a police Major and this was a mediocrities
revenge? I did comment more than once that I suffered discrimination by
the Spaniard community in that school leading to my... (satisfaction) time
to study music and math by myself. Probably he knew the man I met as LU is
Bi strain. But now it makes me wonder... Ledezma said he killed a man in a
highway but didnt say when... so maybe he killed the real Lu is Bi strain
so that the false Lu is Bi strain could take his place in a most expensive
university and have his chance to apply their rags to richness method? I
needed to have PI attributions to handle these messes... Obviously the
experience I am going through was planned and they expected me to tie
together all strings. Standard technique as commented in one of teh Steren
essays, that of pretending it was all a story and dint happen in Reality,
but this begun under the pressure of telling whoever was leading the
(nonexistent!) case that we were being confused in name and physiognomy.
Then the Christian method beecame evident, CONFESS! But confess what if I
am accusing? Chin chin, being blamed for what others are doing... so he
was using a semantic mechanism the few times he spoke! (his father with
facial surgery taking the place of the associate...)! Recognition... that
lead was good, the person wrong, a life stalker...
Walkie talkies work because there is a bypass between the aural processing
area and the transmission area. What is heard is transmitted. But aural
input is mediated by conscience, most of the time. A pure walkie talkie
would have this conscience processing areas weakened, damaged,
transmitting aural verbal input as is, unthinkingly, so a person speaking
would hear the voice that speaks, though still some processing to the
message may happen, adding addressing information additional to the base
signal that matches other receptors. In a non damaged brain conscience of
the message would process it before the signal propagates to the
transmission area through the bypass. The inner voice and other
information would be added to the message. This is an empiric matter, with
some cases fuzzy according to the level of attention the walkie talkie
pays to unexpected aural verbal input.
Horror emotions can be considered to be on the same level as orgasmic
pleasure. Both do share one physical expression: they make the body
experiment shivers. Once sexuality is wasted, horror takes its place, or
it can totally substitute it when inhibitions toward sex are great at a
younger age. Old age, being near death, will consider horror as a form of
pleasure. Note the schizophrenic mechanistic transference of
pleasure-horror in the antagonism church-antichurch, or priest vs devil.
BOTH pleasure and horror are associated to the devil, but none to church
associates. Church members become transparent, the **suffering** of these
emotions being attributed to the other side, both with bad consequences,
which means the church doesnt experiment or consides either pleasure nor
horror. It remains clean, which in essence means that church members
(priests) CAN go through both without guilt as they will be blamed on
somebody else. Herein lies the explanation for sadism, as the expression
of sick minds in damaged brains, a substitution of pleasure for horror,
ending in the attraction to gore as pleasure when, for whatever reasons
(rationalizations), pleasure is sought to be turned into horror, revenge
being probably the most fundamental. An utmost revenge requires death and
beyond, gore, leading to the discovery of pleasure in horror and their
association. Sexual inhibitions (vows) will do the rest, substituting
tender sexual pleasure for brutal gore, leading to the same strong
emotion.
[Considering schizophrenia a totally endogenous disease means the person s
brain produces voices for its own **enjoyment**, but thenthose voices are
teh product of the contents of that mind, a schizo in the classical sense
of being divided, making some percentage of the brain to constantly speak
to the rest of it. This dynamic reduces attention on the outer world,
therefore reducing the input of new material to feed the content of
voices. Their content will become eventually conventional, variations
resulting from pure combinations of a small set of meanings. This leads to
either total obsession on a single concept, pure psychosis, idee fixe, or
to the dissapearance of the voices, spontaneus curing, or to different
forms of autism, attention deficit, the result depending on the relation
between brain resources used to generate voices and brain resources used
to be conscious of them.]
Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- References:
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- Prev by Date: Re: What should be Nationalised *VS* Privatized? The WONDERFUL Danish Welfare State!
- Next by Date: Re: What should be Nationalised *VS* Privatized? The WONDERFUL Danish Welfare State!
- Previous by thread: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- Next by thread: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|