Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- From: "Dan in Philly" <djr8@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 02:13:22 GMT
""Peter Bjørn Perlsø"" wrote in message ...
Taxes affect incentives. Higher tax usually means less incentive to make
a transaction, but not that the incentive is eliminated.
The original idea was to compare intelligence with land, and taxing them.
With land, you can tax it up to 100% (assuming people can't disguise 10
acres to look like 9 acres) without affecting real output. Now consider a
person who earns lots of $$ thanks to his intelligence. If you tax away the
'extra' $$ that arises from his brains, he will have less take-home pay. But
will he quit his nice, cushy desk job? I doubt it.
Dan in Philly
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- From: jmh
- Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- From: S . Doo
- Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- References:
- 'Waterhole' and land rents
- From: Dan in Philly
- Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- From: Dan in Philly
- Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- From: Sgt.Sausage
- Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- 'Waterhole' and land rents
- Prev by Date: Re: georgist claptrap
- Next by Date: Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- Previous by thread: Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- Next by thread: Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|