Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- From: jmh <jmhall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 16:41:36 GMT
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 02:13:22 GMT, Dan in Philly in sci.econ
confessed to the world saying:
""Peter Bjrn Perls"" wrote in message ...
Taxes affect incentives. Higher tax usually means less incentive to make
a transaction, but not that the incentive is eliminated.
The original idea was to compare intelligence with land, and taxing them.
With land, you can tax it up to 100% (assuming people can't disguise 10
acres to look like 9 acres) without affecting real output. Now consider a
That's the LTV claim, based on it being a pure transfer or an
economic rent but I think that's also ignoring the wealth effect
so is that a true claim?
jmh
.
- References:
- 'Waterhole' and land rents
- From: Dan in Philly
- Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- From: Dan in Philly
- Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- From: Sgt.Sausage
- Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- From: Peter Bjørn Perlsø
- Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- From: Dan in Philly
- 'Waterhole' and land rents
- Prev by Date: Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- Next by Date: Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- Previous by thread: Re: Taxing Intelligence/Talent (was: 'Waterhole' and land rents)
- Next by thread: Re: 'Waterhole' and land rents
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|