Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: "FabrizioJBonsignore" <djbonsignore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:30:55 -0500
On Jan 24, 5:59 am, "FabrizioJBonsignore" <djbonsign...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
brain
Do you understand that belief in the ADTERLIFE comes because a brain
can survive a dead body long enough to emit some voices, maybe even
without noting it is already dead? The brain can survive a dead body
ENOUGH to use telepathy!!! They dont understand that a frightened
signalin a dead body will edperiment a rush of adrenaline making it use
telepathy to access other people. Some beliefs can be understood now.
Big pain would turn the speech, if at all, blurry, blurrying the
ato the point that a apeson dying in pain, torture, would be UNABLE to
use telapthy to report his death. Dying CONVINCED of afterlife and in
thestate of peacefulness would be able to emit a coherent enough message
to be heard, the famous light, which of course would be charged of
formedbelief, able to convince other people, schizos. A chain is thus
also Tibetan reincarnation of the Dalai Lama; the dying Dalai Lamaof belief in the afterlife, when in fact it is just a signal
transmitted beacuse of a SURVIVAL mechanism: that of alarm, the
adrenaline alarm system acting to deliver a message when the body
itself feels its death, a fact taht is RATIONAL, mindful, not
biological in the sense that a body can recognize something else that
damage expressed as pain. Of course, the better this abilities are
essayed in life (Bardo Todol preparation, meditation,
magnetizes a baby or a boy s brain, even for months, an event sensitive
lamas would be able to track down to the baby; what exactly is
communicated and can be transmitted is a matter for research, though most
likely it is deep memories the only content that would survive brain
growth and learning, while self, consciousness, cognitive abilities and
other mind potencies being dynamic would be determined by hardwiring and
environment, in other words, unless the transmitting mind can make a one
to one copy of dynamic neural patterns, which implies direct access to its
own contents, the baby would be an independent being, though language
abilities may be enhanced and personality would be colored by projected
memories [experiences, feelings]
become), the better the
telepathic message would be delivered. Note that according to the
formula, some encoding will resonate with another rational target if
the target is contained in that particular thought-message. This is
relevant as people looking like a murderer, if the act of murder is
such that recognition of the danger leaves time to the brain to
ON, WILL get the mesage, including whatever other information it may
contain, most likely base sensations, as a sudden murder would devoid
the person of coherent thought. Here is yet another telepathic
characteristic that makes torture a common act in schizophrenics...
...Arachnids in desert a
[Note that bipolar manic depressive illnesses may be cause by a distant
telepath not strong enough to make its message overcome the threshold of
consiousness. The depressed person would be unable to hear the voice or
voices at the conscious level, only their influence would be felt at the
subconsious level or expressed consciously as sudden black moods and ideas
out of the normal chain of thought. Areas receiving these messages may be
different than those involved in recognition of nearer messages; again,
the complex dynamic of distance, training, awareness, turning it into a
complex casuistic. This idea of a far distance can also explain the myth
of the **voice of conscience**, usually a child s voice. In this case
elements of the full message get lost by distance, mainly any tone of
voice information, leaving words as the most ordered and customary
element, therefore the strongest, though of course the person s self hook
has to be present too in order to receive the message. This makes women
again more susceptible to telepathic phenomena, as males thought can be
reduced mainly to women, _their_ contents divided into men and babies,
children, when it comes at thinking of people in a wide sense, essentially
dividing contacts in half, hence susceptibility; libido, desire, directs
the target of most thoughts, most appreciable over huge masses of
humanity.]
Ruins. Considering that recognition of messages depends on recognizing
very small ordered patterns in resonance (native language) with brain
patterns, it is not impossible that the accumulated effect of people s
mind thinking _at_ buildings and monuments leave behind subtly ordered
molecular patterns, a slight variation over normal molecular freedom but
significative enough for sensitive minds to discern them. Hence the origin
of (legends of) ghosts, memory of murders (other explanations possible),
religious phenomena like prayings, memory of places, feeling of a place
being inhabited, etc. Some ruins would vecome ruins under the necessit yof
schizos of stop hearing the voices of other ages, other peoples. This
would be the more true in hot zones, where alternating warmth and cold
under the combined effect of people s thought, would be enough to
establish this subtle orderings. Of course, religious monuments and ruins,
being the object of praying and the target for the presence of many people
would become more **magnetized** than seldom noticed places. They would
seem to be **alive**, or to share in the religious message. (It would be
interesting to ask if this was one of the reasons why the Buddhas in
Afghanistan were destroyed). The material of monuments would be important,
ceramics, metals and other impurities helping to this effect, though it
has to be taken into account that the **form**, content of directed
thoughts would also make sensitive people fall into the ilusion (or
delusion) that it is the monument that emits the voice, when actually it
is the same brain that picks up the message and it is interpreted,
correctly, as containing or being transmitted from, that building, or for
that matter object. Here we have also the origin of psychic recognition of
objects, of sensitivity to the posession and to the ability to obtain
psychic impressions from an object. Again emotion in the form of fear
would charge these objects and places with very strongly ordered resonant
patters at the molecular level. Destruction of buildings would be the
obvious, not technical solution if they become the preferred target for a
group of people to deliver their messages (or prayings). An alternative
more technological solution would be that of using a foam to cover the
target...
Places where spiders abound or are very noticeable can establish a strong
subconscious association to women in local populations, that can be
measured in an increased level of violence against women. What matters is
that these and other associations, repeated throughout a whole human
population, can produce such strong, base, underlying signals that some
individuals can become truly magnetized by the, lets call it, emotion,
that they express it in the form of real violence. Being exposed to
spiders as a day to day fact can be translated into violence against women
at the level of psychosis! One step beyond phobia to spiders, though it
may be necessary to introduce an internal clasp to sustain those violent
feelings. Some of these clasps, internal like beliefs or external like
mores, may be developed historically as culture, giving as a result
endemic levels of violence. Arachnids do seem to be have this effect more
than other forms of threat, including that of human populations. [An
econometrical study distinguishing between deserts, jungles and other
ecosystems correlated to violence against women would give a good
population level proof]
I am still writing this here because I am still in the same circumstance,
so I insist that the theft of what I was an object is enough to put me
under pressure and danger, myself and other people I still dont have
contact with. I still dont understand how come I am not getting an
adequate RESPONSE to my issues.
Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- References:
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- From: FabrizioJBonsignore
- Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- Prev by Date: Re: Relative Appropriation of Economic Rents
- Next by Date: This Nutsy Nazi (Georgist) Spammer
- Previous by thread: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- Next by thread: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|