Re: The Problem with Economics
- From: jmh <jmhall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:27:43 GMT
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:11:40 -0400, Bob Kolker in sci.econ
confessed to the world saying:
Nospam wrote:
Nothing is wrong with concept of utility.
The utility function is -subjective-. Hence economics -as a science- is
categorically flawed.
Statistics on prices, tonnage etc.... are perfectly objective. Theories
accounting for them are built on sand (so far).
Economics is a crock. It has always been a crock. Most likely, it will
always be crock unless of -real science- of human thinking and
psychology can be developed.
When you can compare two minds objectively, let us know, won't you?
Why does economics have to make that comparison?
jmh
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Problem with Economics
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: The Problem with Economics
- References:
- The Problem with Economics
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: The Problem with Economics
- From: norak
- Re: The Problem with Economics
- From: Nospam
- Re: The Problem with Economics
- From: Bob Kolker
- The Problem with Economics
- Prev by Date: Nicolaus Tideman: Georgist Scammer
- Next by Date: Re: The Problem with Economics
- Previous by thread: Re: The Problem with Economics
- Next by thread: Re: The Problem with Economics
- Index(es):