the loop-d-looped Georgist is very sinister!
- From: w_b_ryan@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 30 Apr 2007 19:50:32 -0700
On Apr 30, 4:02 pm, "sinister" <sinis...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<w_b_r...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1177957121.951756.163870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 25, 5:49 pm, "sinister" <sinis...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
Here's how I see it. You're just basically in effect a
religious fanatic, with a core set of articles of faith.
The pinheaded sort of fanatic who would burn
infidels at the stake if you could. Regarding your
knowledge of economics or lack thereof, you're an
ignoramus who has never actually read a book on
economics. The Georgist stuff doesn't count. As
You're a filthy liar.
In addition to having taken 3 semesters of economics as an undergraduate,
years ago, I've read the graduate-level text by Varian.
You know, it's funny being lectured about economics, and being called a
"regligious fanatic," by someone who's devoted to Social Credit.
Fromhttp://www.counterpunch.org/chuckman02062006.html
"...we should not forget that it was not all that long ago a base for social
credit, that strange amalgam of conservatism, rural values, and financial
mysticism."
LOL!
for the excerpts from the Vickrey article, you
haven't read the article or even seen the book in
which it was published. Just copied the excerpts
from a Georgist site. And I can tell you that it
doesn't say what you think it says.
No, you psychopath, I actually typed it in by hand from a book I retrieved
by interlibrary loan. Try googling on the material. You won't find the
section in its entirety, because (at least as far as Google is concerned),
it exists only in hardcopy AFAICT.
Anyone reading this who is in possession of the book can verify that I typed
the summary section faithfully. Which, at least for those few individuals,
is proof that you're a lying, despicable filth.
"And I can tell you that it doesn't say what you think it says."
Huh? Why would I accept instruction in economics from someone who clearly
doesn't know any?
<snip>
"No, you psychopath, I actually typed it in by hand
from a book I retrieved by interlibrary loan. Try
googling on the material. You won't find the
section in its entirety, because (at least as far as
Google is concerned), it exists only in hardcopy
AFAICT."
---------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
Perhaps you will try
http://www.wealthandwant.com/themes/HG_Theorem.html
a decidedly Georgist page which has exactly the
same two paragraphs from that same Vickrey paper.
Only the same two paragraphs that you "typed" with
nothing else whatsoever from the paper. And
exactly the same two paragraphs at several Georgist
sites. I could list them for you but I'm not going to.
And if you will actually read the entirety of the
paper -- assuming you've really seen it as you claim
-- you will see that it is a stretch to call it Georgist.
A little homework assignment from the paper. You
will have to had read the paper or have access to it
to answer. What does Vickrey mean by the "GHV
theorem"? I'll give you a very big clue and simplify
the question. V stands for Vickrey. G stands for
George. What does H stand for? You may simply
copy your response from the paper if you wish. I
shall expect your answer by 10:00 Eastern Time.
Bye.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: the loop-d-looped Georgist is very sinister!
- From: Econ_Amateur
- Re: the loop-d-looped Georgist is very sinister!
- From: royls
- Re: Social Credit nutjob answered
- From: sinister
- Re: the loop-d-looped Georgist is very sinister!
- Next by Date: Re: Social Credit nutjob answered
- Next by thread: Re: Social Credit nutjob answered
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
