Re: more anti-Georgist commentary
- From: w_b_ryan@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 10 May 2007 20:52:31 -0700
On May 10, 8:28 pm, r...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
No, the supply of land in the economic sense
(natural resources) is definitely and indisputably
fixed, as I have informed _you_ many times before,
and as all economically literate people know.
-----------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
Please don't use the word "economic" when
referring to the Georgist articles of faith. Please
don't use the word "literate" in reference to what
you are saying.
The supply of natural resources including land most
definitely depend on discovery and development,
which means that it is most definitely not fixed.
It is being created by conscious human effort all the
time.
That's why the Georgist argument is complete
nonsense.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: more anti-Georgist commentary
- From: royls
- Re: more anti-Georgist commentary
- References:
- more anti-Georgist commentary
- From: w_b_ryan
- Re: more anti-Georgist drivel
- From: royls
- Re: more anti-Georgist commentary
- From: w_b_ryan
- Re: more anti-Georgist commentary
- From: royls
- more anti-Georgist commentary
- Prev by Date: Re: Murray Rothbard on Georgist fallacies
- Next by Date: Re: more anti-Georgist commentary
- Previous by thread: Re: more anti-Georgist commentary
- Next by thread: Re: more anti-Georgist commentary
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|