Re: Public Finance
- From: Steve Campbell <SteveCampbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 May 2007 18:13:30 -0700
On May 12, 4:06 pm, ozernr <ozer...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Friends,
I have an assignement from the public finance course and I can't find
anything related with my topic. My topic is ;
"The government has no role in redistributing income: all necessary
transfers can be achieved by private charity" Is it true or not?
Discuss in fublic finance context..
If you will help me, about what can I write.. I will be very
pleased..
It's possible but not very practical.
Most existing private charities have a non-secular bent, and there is
a need for secularity in an organization that will provide welfare to
the general population.
I'd say that managing state welfare could be privatized; but it would
have to be done in the same way as prisons, toll roads, and utilities.
The service-delivery organizations would be heavily regulated and
required to meet certain government-mandated requirements. The same
organization could also be a charitable organization that receives tax-
deductible private contributions. But large contributions could not
come with conditions for recipients which are not approved by the
legislative bodies that provide oversight.
.
- References:
- Public Finance
- From: ozernr
- Public Finance
- Prev by Date: Re: Murray Rothbard on Georgist fallacies
- Next by Date: help
- Previous by thread: Public Finance
- Next by thread: Re: Public Finance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
