Re: definition of ownership
- From: "Mark M." <markm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 20:11:28 -0500
w_b_ryan@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On May 25, 10:17 pm, "Mark M." <m...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Sorry. I should have said certain man-made things.
"Ownership in land is not unconditional like
ownership in man-made things. Ownership in land
is on four conditions: police power, escheat,
taxation, and eminent domain. The police can come
on your property if they have a warrant."
----------------------------------------------
Where did you get the idea that ownership in "man-
made things" is unconditional? It is certainly not
unconditional under the law.
Mark M.
.
- References:
- Question on what is produced and what is not
- From: Peter B. P.
- Re: Question on what is produced and what is not
- From: royls
- definition of ownership
- From: w_b_ryan
- Re: definition of ownership
- From: Les Cargill
- Re: definition of ownership
- From: w_b_ryan
- Re: definition of ownership
- From: Mark M.
- Re: definition of ownership
- From: w_b_ryan
- Re: definition of ownership
- From: Mark M.
- Re: definition of ownership
- From: w_b_ryan
- Question on what is produced and what is not
- Prev by Date: Re: Making less than dad did
- Next by Date: Re: Labor theory of cost
- Previous by thread: Re: definition of ownership
- Next by thread: Re: definition of ownership
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|