the creed of his econo-religion
- From: w_b_ryan@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 28 May 2007 06:06:24 -0700
On May 27, 10:48 pm, The Trucker <mik...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Land has no cost. The APPARENT cost of
particular locations is _labor_ saved by virtue of
that location. In a good location I need only work
half as much to produce the same personal benefits
for myself as I would have in some other location. I
can afford to give up some amount of my produce
as payment for the use of the location and still
PROFIT from the benefit of the location. I labor
LESS for the net personal benefits I receive after
paying the rent or I would not locate myself in that
location. The net cost to me in labor for the use of
the location is zero or less. And the fact remains
that labor is what is being expended for the land
rights and the benefits I receive, i.e. all goods are
produced by labor."
------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
So, this is your creed in your econo-religion. It
certainly ain't reasoned belief.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: the creed of his econo-religion
- From: The Trucker
- Re: the creed of his econo-religion
- From: royls
- Re: the creed of his econo-religion
- References:
- Labor theory of cost
- From: Michael L. Coburn
- Re: Labor theory of cost
- From: Edmund Esterbauer
- Re: Labor theory of cost
- From: Michael L. Coburn
- Re: Labor theory of cost
- From: jmh
- Re: Labor theory of cost
- From: radav
- Re: Labor theory of cost
- From: jmh
- Re: Labor theory of cost
- From: The Trucker
- Labor theory of cost
- Prev by Date: New finance/economics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 28, 2007
- Next by Date: Re: Labor theory of cost
- Previous by thread: Re: Labor theory of cost
- Next by thread: Re: the creed of his econo-religion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|