Re: Economic Rent As Sum of Externalities
- From: "Dan in Philly" <djr8@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 00:58:49 GMT
<royls@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message ...
On 30 May 2007 08:04:23 -0700, "James A. Bowery" wrote:
<snip>
Seems to me we can separate two kinds of rent. Owning a piece of land in its
original state (good farmland, a mountain pass) would yield the usual
definition of rent, and raises the issue of fairness (how did people get
ownership in the first place?)
But if you look at a city, an empty lot in a nice neighborhood is worth a
lot of money. Clearly the increased value is caused by the surroundings,
which I suppose is an externality.
Trying to figure out who is responsible for the increased value would be
difficult.
Dan in Philly
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Economic Rent As Sum of Externalities
- From: The Trucker
- Re: Economic Rent As Sum of Externalities
- References:
- Economic Rent As Sum of Externalities
- From: James A. Bowery
- Re: Economic Rent As Sum of Externalities
- From: royls
- Re: Economic Rent As Sum of Externalities
- From: James A. Bowery
- Re: Economic Rent As Sum of Externalities
- From: royls
- Re: Economic Rent As Sum of Externalities
- From: James A. Bowery
- Re: Economic Rent As Sum of Externalities
- From: royls
- Economic Rent As Sum of Externalities
- Prev by Date: Re: Economic Rent As Sum of Externalities
- Next by Date: Re: Labor theory of cost
- Previous by thread: pure Georgist ranting
- Next by thread: Re: Economic Rent As Sum of Externalities
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|