Re: Economic Rent As Sum of Externalities

On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:37:07 GMT, royls@xxxxxxxxx in sci.econ
confessed to the world saying:

No, that is _not_ the issue here. The issue would be the same even
had Smith never existed. You don't seem to understand that it is a
scientific issue, not a mere matter of exegetical scholarship.

What "scientific issue"? The question of material existance
of the external world is not in questions here.

The question of man having created that external world is
also not is question here.

The only question here is whether or not man can individually
own some of that external world and then allow other's to
use it for the owner's gain. This is NOT a scientific
issue outside the question of "Is that happening now or
not?" Since that's NOT the question here your "scientific
issue" is a red herring.

jmh
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Economic Rent As Sum of Externalities
    ... not a mere matter of exegetical scholarship. ... saying something to which I most heartily subscribe: ... someone would _want_ privatization of any natural ... a society or for the society as a whole? ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: Well Done!
    ... "You have evidence that Paul Smith had a pre-determined conclusion ... Smith released a press relase saying speed bumps kill 500 people a ... call for the Chair of the London Ambulance Service, Mr Sigurd Reinton, ...
    (uk.rec.cycling)
  • Re: Paging Champ.
    ... like they were saying: ... are the blight of many other high street chains - i.e. people who come ... browse through a book in WH Smith and then buy it from Amazon. ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: michael smith on weei
    ... > Smith is right, but for the most part, Brady is saying, "I thought we ... it's a shame we didn't show it by playing better. ...
    (alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots)
  • Re: Carl Eduards 1936 UK visit
    ... Ms Smith wrote: ... What on earth are you on? ... Are you saying that Carl's visit did not ... Gary Holtzman ...
    (alt.talk.royalty)