Re: From the rich. To the rich?
- From: "Dan in Philly" <djr8@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 01:41:15 GMT
<royls@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message =..
Simple concept really: the people who create value should be justly
compensated.
And it's a very good concept. I'm just not clear on how you think it
is related to your proposal to give landowners value that they do not
create.
I don't want to give _landowners_ value that they don't create. I want to
give _capital-owners_ value that they _do_ create.
Consider a typical city. If there were no buildings or factories, then all
you have is farmland in the middle of nowhere. Average land value, about 1
k$ per acre. But in a city with lots of capital, typical land value is maybe
500 k$ per acre. That extra 499 k$ is due to the presence of productive
enterprises nearby.
When the LVT takes away the 500 k$, I want to return it to the people who
created it, the nearby capital owners.
Dan in Philly
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: From the rich. To the rich?
- From: royls
- Re: From the rich. To the rich?
- From: Mark M.
- Re: From the rich. To the rich?
- References:
- LVT: From the rich. To the rich?
- From: Dan in Philly
- Re: From the rich. To the rich?
- From: Dan in Philly
- Re: From the rich. To the rich?
- From: royls
- LVT: From the rich. To the rich?
- Prev by Date: Re: Deflation on the doorstep
- Next by Date: Re: From the rich. To the rich?
- Previous by thread: Re: From the rich. To the rich?
- Next by thread: Re: From the rich. To the rich?
- Index(es):