Free trade mean anti-capitalism



Free trade mean anti-capitalism (the obvious argument again?)

For centuries now, economists en-masse refuse to acknowledge the
simplest of conclusions: the private finance-sector is a hostile
factor in a free trade (free price setting) economy.

The consumer and labor pressure already selects for quality
production, no other effect is necessary for the purpose of getting
good products/services. It is true that greedy consumers select for a
poor wage, a poor working conditions and a poor law `loyalty' behavior
in companies, because these things are cost factors in the price of a
consumer good. However, the greater consumer masses bite their own leg,
they have to live and work in the companies they are stimulating. That
in addition to a more problematic effect that happens when wages are
already low: people on low wages have no option but to choose for low
prices, a vicious circle starts keeping the economy in its grip.
This opens up the potential of a long-term learning-cycle in consumers,
so that consumers would select more for fair-wage good-behavior
companies -- in which they then will be workers, serving their own
need.

So far so good with the trade economy. But private finance has
its own selection criteria: good products and services, certainly.
But that was already covered by consumer choice. What private Capital
investment want, is profit for allowing a position of power (money)
to be (temporarily) shared with a business (owner). This "privilege"
of using inventors money is not work on the part of the investor,
it is a gambling game and as such non-productive. If only that was
the entire problem, if the Capitalists were only a sector of parasites
not doing too much damage outside of their immediate profit taking.

The investor looks for high return, and will therefore also stimulate
what the greedy consumer stimulates: poor conditions for workers,
evasion of the law, and on top of that dictatorial companies. For
the investor there will not be a learning-cycle toward "good,"
the investor does not work (the professional money gambler), and
investors who "do good," will simply end up losing their money,
becoming irrelevant. Doing good costs money, it won't flow back to
private Capital. These things are roughly as obvious as that a
boat needs to be water-tight in order to sail. Yet economists refuse
to acknowledge and decimate the obvious. Partners in crime with
Capitalists, organized crime, elitism and Imperialism (extorting money
from other economies, pretending to have earned it yourself and
parading the wealth as proof of a succesful economy ...) ?

The private finance-sector has no place in a free trade economy.
It occupies the place of the democratic government, which needs the
power of money-investment to keep the economy healthy, and combat
(rather then stimulate) the effects of greedy consumers. A free
trade economy needs to be supported by a public finance sector,
which is non-profit and controlled by voters.

Free market = anti-capitalism and public-finance. (This means that
the American/Western ideology is self-contradictory, it is
(self-serving) nonsense; a populist ploy (IMHO) to keep voters coming.)
--
http://www.xs4all.nl/~joshb
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Newsweek: The Great Shopping Spree, R.I.P.
    ... It was the ever-expanding stream of consumer spending that pulled the ... U.S. economy forward and, to a lesser extent, did the same for the ... imports satisfied much of Americans' ... L.L. Bean began accepting credit ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: My take on the flawed "Fair Tax" (repost)
    ... > As far as I am concerned - and as far as you have agreed - taxes are> ultimately paid by the consumer. ... that PITAX is a business cost and it is withholding due to wages, one concludes that transaction prices stay constent after NST and after-tax wage income stays the same and thus retains is PPP. ... the economy is subject to the foibles of human nature and the ... >> dispute) is that the workings of the economy are largely subject to the ...
    (misc.taxes)
  • Re: late degenerate capitalism
    ... its products are not real houses at all - but `cartoon houses.` They have ... Tune approach to finance radiated to all points of the economy. ... The `consumer economy` was always a mockery. ... It may look like capitalism from a distance. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: OT: Stimulus
    ... I'm thinking that it won't necessarily be the businesses with good ... According to the articles/reports I saw yesterday, the consumer is in ... Until consumers see that the economy is turning around, ... Apparently, the fear is that, as prices begin to fall, ...
    (alt.support.mult-sclerosis)
  • OT: Tell me again how strong the economy is
    ... Key facts -- GDP growth rate slowed to 1.6% in the third quarter, ... Yet Republicans keep telling us how strong the economy is. ... Consumer confidence is falling, and consumer ... The consumer sector held up well, with consumer spending accelerating from ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)