Extortion rights of rent collectors protected by the US Constitution?
- From: "sinister" <sinister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:09:04 -0500
"Lawmakers Move to Grant Banks Immunity Against Patent Lawsuit"
By Jeffrey H. Birnbaum
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 14, 2008; Page A22
URL:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/13/AR2008021303731.html
First two paragraphs:
"Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) has sponsored an unusual provision at the
urging of the nation's banks granting them immunity against an active patent
lawsuit, potentially saving them billions of dollars.
"Adopted with little fanfare, the amendment would prevent a small Texas
company called DataTreasury from collecting damages from banks for
infringing on its patented method for digitally scanning, sending and
archiving checks. The patents were upheld last summer by the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office after they were challenged."
Key paragraph: "The federal government would have to pay $1 billion to
DataTreasury over 10 years as compensation for taking its property under the
amendment, according to estimates by the Congressional Budget Office."
I thought the government had the right to do things like compel patent
licensing, if it decided to do so. With that right, I would have thought
there'd be an accompanying right to set the fee that rent collecting
parasites were allowed to collect.
NB: Richard Epstein is a leading light in the movement to make
rent-collecting extortion a fundamental right. (He's not mentioned in the
article; that's just an aside.)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Extortion rights of rent collectors protected by the US Constitution?
- From: Democracy Highlander
- Re: Extortion rights of rent collectors protected by the US Constitution?
- From: ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Extortion rights of rent collectors protected by the US Constitution?
- Prev by Date: Ammistrazioni delle Finanze dello Giuen Holding Ltd. Corporation
- Next by Date: Employers posting job ads to look good
- Previous by thread: Ammistrazioni delle Finanze dello Giuen Holding Ltd. Corporation
- Next by thread: Re: Extortion rights of rent collectors protected by the US Constitution?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|