increase in value = increase in wealth?
- From: RichD <r_delaney2001@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:22:05 -0800 (PST)
Let's say an object you purchased - an 'investment' - goes up
in value; a painting, land, house, ... kudos
And let's say the increase in market price is greater than
inflation. Hence this rise in value is demand driven; the
object is worth more today than yesterday.
Now, can we say there is a net gain of wealth, if no
new products or services have been generated? It
seems to me this is purely a zero sum situation -
something else must have dropped in value.
(consider: the house has deteriorated over time, it
should depreciate!)
You could analyze it strictly in monetary terms - if
there's more money spent on the object, less must be
spent elsewhere - but it's not so simple, as perhaps no
money changed hands, the gain is 'on paper', so to speak.
How does conventional economics answer this?
--
Rich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: increase in value = increase in wealth?
- From: Ron Peterson
- Re: increase in value = increase in wealth?
- From: royls
- Re: increase in value = increase in wealth?
- From: jwpgarrett@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: increase in value = increase in wealth?
- Prev by Date: Re: Are the Filthy Rich Necessary?
- Next by Date: Re: Move over, subprime !
- Previous by thread: Re: Are the Filthy Rich Necessary?
- Next by thread: Re: increase in value = increase in wealth?
- Index(es):
Loading