Re: How will taxes improve the economy?
- From: Les Cargill <lcargill@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:37:31 -0500
Michael Coburn wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:36:45 -0500, Les Cargill wrote:
Michael Coburn wrote:On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:46:22 -0500, Les Cargill wrote:<snip>If and only if the payments are troublesome. Assuming GDP growth, noLemme rephrase: What does Joe Sixpack gain if Biff Moneybags' taxes goNo. Ignoring the deficits is not the correct thing to do. The
up? Ignore the deficit for the moment - it's surreal money and we can
safely ignore it for now.
interest on the debt is a dead weight loss.
problem. GDP buries the finance costs quite handily. Look at GDP in
1900, 1945 and now.
But you are now running in circles. If taxation is employed properly to direct the productivity of the economy then GDP will be much better than it would have otherwise been.
No question of *that*. It was directed in unproductive ways. This
wasn't felt because there's so much productivity already that
there were no shortages. When a small fraction make everything,
you don't feel it.
Our disagreement is that I see the US government (the representatives of the common people of the USA) as a better judge of how to invest for the sake of Americans than I do the very wealthy that seek to maximize their own gains regardless of or even in spite of the common people.
I agree - we disagree. How, exactly is government supposed to do that? They don't have any means of obtaining the information, organizing
the tasks or evaluating the outcome. Government is inherently
*regulatory* - it deals in "thou shalt not" statements.
Multinational _OWNERS_ are concerned about their wealth maximization and that may well not coincide with the maximization of wealth of the US citizenry.
Meh. It may, or it may not. But what we've seen with "making
public the risk, and making private the reward" is rent seeking
in its purest form.
If a multinational offends me, I can stop trading with it.
I am of the opinion that wealth maximization of the top ranks has been disadvantageous to the majority of the American people.
I'm not. And ,if wealth follows a logistic curve, it
doesn't matter...
This idea that the rich get richer only by creating better lives for the common people does not say much about the American common people in particular.
I'm not sure what you mean - but unless you accept that money
has information content when people spend it...
It has no information content when it's extracted forcibly,
or gained falsely. But when it's used for honest commerce,
we can safely assume that both parties benefit.
The Chinese and the Indians may be loving it.
I doubt that.
But the American middle class is not.
Taxes are the tool by which a better deal for the American middle class can be had.
I still don't know how that works....
--
Les Cargill
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How will taxes improve the economy?
- From: Michael Coburn
- Re: How will taxes improve the economy?
- References:
- How will taxes improve the economy?
- From: Les Cargill
- Re: How will taxes improve the economy?
- From: Michael Coburn
- Re: How will taxes improve the economy?
- From: Les Cargill
- Re: How will taxes improve the economy?
- From: Michael Coburn
- Re: How will taxes improve the economy?
- From: Les Cargill
- Re: How will taxes improve the economy?
- From: Michael Coburn
- How will taxes improve the economy?
- Prev by Date: Re: Money creation by banks: is this really how it works?
- Next by Date: The Treasury planned to buy toxic bank assets, but it was a bad idea ...
- Previous by thread: Re: How will taxes improve the economy?
- Next by thread: Re: How will taxes improve the economy?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|