Re: 15 Point Plan for Reform of America's Dysfunctional Political System
- From: jos boersema <joshb@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Nov 2009 14:10:01 GMT
On 2009-11-22, Sean <here@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Jos,
I am very grateful that you replied to my post ... I am short of time but I
did look in on your webpage there .. and first impressions it is very very
well done [ forget the deatils for now ]
Thanks !! I don't get a lot of compliments so thanks again.
It looks well laid out - you have done a lot of work there.
Well yeah, it was quite a bit of work, though in a sense it was also
easier then you might imagine it. Kind of like if you have an idea
where you want to go and you've already been confronted with things
that happened in history (like 'people's committees' government) and
so on, then it turns out not to be that difficult. The chinese
technique: think long, then dash it out in a few seconds and hope it'll
come out ok.
I appreciate your comments below, hav only skimmed it, but it lloks great
and I like you openness and frankness too ... let me have a good lok thru
your reply and your constituion info and I will get back to you.
Great. Take your time, no rush.
btw I am Australian ,... and included in my post is a bit of fun along the
way, with a few digs at a fewe people and mindsets I have dealt with over
the years online. Really it was merely a discussion post I was puttin gout
there for no particualr reason but an effrot to lift the level of the debate
online and not a treatise like you have prepared.
Last year I noticed during the US Election that whole new group of people in
Amercia went online to usenet/newsgroups in a huge wave to argue politics
and it hasn't stopped since nor retuened to pre-2008 levels .. something is
going on that is more than just tea parties and health care and Obama being
a 'commmunist" .
Hope so, I hope that will happen because i've not noticed that yet.
Sadly many ppl who go unemployed may end up losing I'net connection too.
ok will get back to you Jios,
much thankx Sean
Sure, we'll get it done. I'm confident it'll work and if not: not a
problem in the world, we'll go right back to something that was before.
System doesn't function ? Right back at the senate/parliament, no
problem. As you might have noticed I'm favoring the slow method through
parliament but even the revolution as mapped out wants to leave the
existing neo-Roman state standing (then later possible merger of people
and assets). This has been named 'building the new model inside the
old' and it's definitely the way to go imho. Not antagonism, but
mutual benefit. The ppl that populated the old state, they can
come right back into the new. It is better for people if a transition is
as soft and carefree as possible, a true historical process.
I'm a bit getting worried, because the longer ppl are waiting with my
plan, the more the enemy is working on their plans and they don't have
good things in mind fwik. Then the shock of such a revolution becomes
greater, in addition to the things the bad people may be doing as well,
which may also be shocking (war is always shocking isn't it.) So it is
much better if we can get underway here, starting with party-formation.
If you agree, you can start your DAVID-[YOUR_NAME] sister party, i have
some free webspace for you. Make a logo, much of the organizational
setup and goals and methods, it's all mapped out. Certainly you can
deviate on most points, although at some point i'd obviously not be in
favor anymore (at least the 4 basic points to qualify for being on my
site at least). It's all mapped out, ready to go, like a scenario/story.
It's all in the open and stuff, no secret things, feel free to send the
secret services the complete details of what we're going to try to do.
Once we win, we own their employement contracts and their records. We're
not against the state, we are the state. Those now in the state, they
are the citizens we're responsible for too.
BTW, we're on opposite sides of the world, your nation is among the
sparsest populated, mine among the densest, and we both have the same
number of people total.
http://www.socialism.nl/archives <<-- I'm abviously always worried about
getting wacked, so therefore i've all prepared in advance. Download ? thx
ALL-IN-ONE.tar has it all, 34 MB GNU/Linux zipped, all free of course.
Note that in the worst case scenario the enemy might start hunting for
us and the material. Only one copy need to survive, then we can make it.
Yeah I know lot's of claims and confidence, but what am I gonna do.
take care.
"jos boersema" <joshb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message.
news:slrnhgi5a5.155.joshb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 2009-11-22, Sean <here@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
My proposals are far to big to discuss easily, please study. I'm *NOT*
a PhD either, so not corrupted with nonsense from the bought and sold
universities :).
--
I can seriously relate to your last poiint .. religious people don;t only
belong to Religions :)
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: 15 Point Plan for Reform of America's Dysfunctional Political System
- Next by Date: Re: U.N. pushes Golden Rule
- Previous by thread: Re: 15 Point Plan for Reform of America's Dysfunctional Political System
- Next by thread: HAVOC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
