Re: Whole house surge suppressors
From: Charles Perry (pipesandtobacco_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 07/08/04
- Next message: Terry Pinnell: "Re: Anyone got Forrest Mim's Engineer's Notebook at hand?"
- Previous message: Gurjot Singh Bakhshi: "PMOS vs NMOS size"
- In reply to: w_tom: "Re: Whole house surge suppressors"
- Next in thread: w_tom: "Re: Whole house surge suppressors"
- Reply: w_tom: "Re: Whole house surge suppressors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 07:01:14 -0400
"w_tom" <w_tom1@usa.net> wrote in message
news:dfee1359.0407072142.4560ad12@posting.google.com...
> Yes communication ports are easily damaged where they are used beyond
> what they were designed for. Two examples are RS-232 ports and
> outside speakers to a stereo amp. However first one must ask where
> was the incoming and outgoing path for that damage.
You missed part of the discussion of the paper I referenced. Even with
proper grounding, you can get a large induced voltage at the appliance.
Believe me. We have done the testing for NIST. A whole house surge
protector only protects for overvoltages on the power. It does NOT protect
for potential difference between power and communications. These potential
differences are the cause of many failures. Perhaps you should google a
NIST document called "Surges Happen".
Charles Perry P.E.
- Next message: Terry Pinnell: "Re: Anyone got Forrest Mim's Engineer's Notebook at hand?"
- Previous message: Gurjot Singh Bakhshi: "PMOS vs NMOS size"
- In reply to: w_tom: "Re: Whole house surge suppressors"
- Next in thread: w_tom: "Re: Whole house surge suppressors"
- Reply: w_tom: "Re: Whole house surge suppressors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]