Re: Reading a High Voltage

From: Dr Engelbert Buxbaum (engelbert_buxbaum_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/04/04


Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 10:11:55 +0200

CFoley1064 wrote:

> Hi, Jas. Mr. Popelish has this exactly right. I'd like to add one small piece
> of advice, if I could. If it's possible your 0-500V input voltage is going to
> change quickly, you also have to take into account the capacitive divider, too.
> All resistors have an inherent capacitance in parallel with their resistance.
> It isn't much (low pF level), but in the event of rapidly changing input
> voltage, it could result in a nanosecond excursion at the input pin of a couple
> hundred volts.
>
> If I had to use a VDVR to measure high voltage with a PIC, I'd use a 470 pF cap
> to GND in parallel with the 10K resistor, which should swamp out the capacitive
> VDVR. It will also slow down your response time, but will give you some
> improvement in input noise.
>
> High Voltage VDVR
> Voltage Input PIC Input
> ___
> o---|___|--o----o--------o
> R1 | |
> .-. |
> | | ---
> R2| | ---
> '-' | C1
> | |
> === ===
> GND GND

And possibly replace R1 with several smaller resistors in series, to
prevent high voltage from leaking into the PIC. I would additionally
place protection diodes from the PIC input to ground and positive
supply, just in case.
                                                o +Ub
                                                |
                                               _|__
                                                /\ \ ZD5V6
                                               / \
                                               ----
                                                |
       ___ ____ ____ ____ |
  o---|___|--|____|--|____|--|____|--o----o-----o--o PIC input
                                     | | |
         4 x 1.275 M .-. | _|__
                                    | | --- /\
                                  R2| | --- / \ DUS
                                    '-' | C1 ----
                                     | | |
                                    === === ===
                                    GND GND

This should limit the input voltage of the PIC to -0.7 to +5.6 V,
probably survivable.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Faraday "magnetic" induction without a magnetic field.
    ... >>>used to thinking that a piece of wire connecting two resistors puts ... > If you consider the circuit as having a string of n > series ... > resistors- all but two being 0, then the total voltage across these two ... Implicit in this and not mentioned is that there was no induced voltage in either the left or right side of the circuit -There is no reason to believe that to be true. ...
    (sci.physics.electromag)
  • Re: transient analysis of linear system
    ... Anyway the circuit is shown above. ... voltage divider of the difference of Vx and Vy. ... the user but it must be the steady state result. ... The point of all this is to 'see' if the resistors change ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Faraday "magnetic" induction without a magnetic field.
    ... I already pointed out that instead of 2 resistors with two taps as ... If you consider the circuit as having a string of n ... resistors- all but two being 0, then the total voltage across these two ... would be distributed with the battery in circuit- even if non-linear. ...
    (sci.physics.electromag)
  • Re: Faraday "magnetic" induction without a magnetic field.
    ... ignoring the meters there is only a single current loop. ... the circuit is. ... Thevenin's voltage is an easy way that usually ... You have an ideal voltage source in series with two resistors -3 elements with a single common current (Note that Lewin also assumed this when calculating the current by Ohms law. ...
    (sci.physics.electromag)
  • Re: How bright would this be?
    ... > I am interested in high voltage and want to build a Marx Generator. ... device - which depends on on your choice of charging resistors. ...
    (sci.electronics.basics)