Re: Marriage is under fire!!
From: Rich Grise (null_at_example.net)
Date: 08/14/04
- Next message: Rich Grise: "Re: Marriage is under fire!!"
- Previous message: John Fields: "Re: telephone current"
- In reply to: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: Marriage is under fire!!"
- Next in thread: John Larkin: "Re: Marriage is under fire!!"
- Reply: John Larkin: "Re: Marriage is under fire!!"
- Reply: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: Marriage is under fire!!"
- Reply: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Marriage is under fire!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 22:12:33 GMT
Jonathan Kirwan wrote:
> Science answers much more modest and pedestrian questions, Rich, that you
...
>>What rule accounts for consciousness?
>
> What do you mean by consciousness? Define it in clear, objective language
> so that others can make specific deductions to specific situations from
> it.
Actually, that was kinda my point. You can't define it in clear, objective
language. According to what's-his-name's philosophy of deterministic
randomness, that means there can't even _be_ any such thing, which is
patently ludicrous.
Good Luck!
Rich
- Next message: Rich Grise: "Re: Marriage is under fire!!"
- Previous message: John Fields: "Re: telephone current"
- In reply to: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: Marriage is under fire!!"
- Next in thread: John Larkin: "Re: Marriage is under fire!!"
- Reply: John Larkin: "Re: Marriage is under fire!!"
- Reply: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: Marriage is under fire!!"
- Reply: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Marriage is under fire!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]