Re: Marriage is under fire!!

From: Kevin Aylward (salesEXTRACT_at_anasoft.co.uk)
Date: 08/17/04 

Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 06:45:38 GMT

Rich Grise wrote:
> Kevin Aylward wrote:
>> andy wrote:
>
>>> I think you're slightly reinventing the logic after my post. The
>>> point of your post as far as I can see was to discredit the idea
>>> that it makes any sense to say a given method of therapy works for
>>> some people and not others.
>>
>> I have no problem with this concept. Sure, some cures only work on
>> some people. However, the fact that some method *appears* to work on
>> some people doesn't mean that it does. One needs controlled tests.
>
> It depends on what your definition of "is" is.

Not at all. I have already explained, many illnesses get better if you
do nothing or anything. You need to prove statistically that there is a
*casual* response from a given action. The fact that someone is better
some time after taking a pill may well be just coincidence.

Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.

Quantcast