Re: Pic, c programing
From: Don Taylor (dont_at_agora.rdrop.com)
Date: 09/14/04
- Next message: CFoley1064: "Re: Relay ratings"
- Previous message: Ken: "Re: Op-amps and Transistors"
- In reply to: CBarn24050: "Re: Pic, c programing"
- Next in thread: David L. Jones: "Re: Pic, c programing"
- Reply: David L. Jones: "Re: Pic, c programing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:26:32 -0500
cbarn24050@aol.com (CBarn24050) writes:
>>Your statements that a C compiler for the PIC takes 5x the code or
>>10-100x the time of an AVR one is just plain silly and ill-informed.
>That isn't what I said.
Someone, several messages earlier in this thread made the comment that
using a C compiler would result in the 5x and 10-100x over assembly.
No particular processor family was mentioned. I believe that was where
this statement originated.
I was skeptical asked for plausible examples of this. No such examples
showed up but I did get email from one person suggesting that I try
to completely re-implement a project of his with my using C and see what
the comparison was. I haven't decided whether to try that or not.
>>. The CodeVision compiler I
>>used took more code space for floating point than my Hitech PICC
>>compiler on the PIC 16 series. I was not that impressed.
>Thats very suprising, I too would not be impressed.
Maybe I'm just using PIC and C for smaller projects, but I wouldn't
think of using floating point math on one of these to begin with :)
- Next message: CFoley1064: "Re: Relay ratings"
- Previous message: Ken: "Re: Op-amps and Transistors"
- In reply to: CBarn24050: "Re: Pic, c programing"
- Next in thread: David L. Jones: "Re: Pic, c programing"
- Reply: David L. Jones: "Re: Pic, c programing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|