Re: Dielectric Constant Standards of Materials?
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 09/27/04
- Next message: Paul Burridge: "Re: To Z or not to Z, that is the question.."
- Previous message: CFoley1064: "Re: Digital Clock Circuit Modification Question"
- In reply to: Joerg: "Re: Dielectric Constant Standards of Materials?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:58:54 +0100
I read in sci.electronics.design that Joerg <notthisjoergsch@removethisp
acbell.net> wrote (in <I5H5d.3421$nj.3193@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>)
about 'Dielectric Constant Standards of Materials?', on Sun, 26 Sep
2004:
>Standard bodies generally don't go as far as dealing with properties of
>each individual material. They only deal with the fundamental units such
>as time, weight, distance etc. Anything beyond that would require a
>hiring spree on their part and a huge tax hike, something we all don't
>want ;-)
I don't suppose too many people would object to the hiring spree, but
the tax hike is quite another matter.
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: Paul Burridge: "Re: To Z or not to Z, that is the question.."
- Previous message: CFoley1064: "Re: Digital Clock Circuit Modification Question"
- In reply to: Joerg: "Re: Dielectric Constant Standards of Materials?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
